metalblue
Well-Known Member
No that isn’t correct - she has requested non dom status. The line put out by her PR is simply intended to obfuscate; being UK tax domiciles does not mean she has to relinquish ties to the country of her birth. E.g. premier league footballers are paid PAYE, that doesn’t mean they cut off ties to Brazil, Portugal etc.
What she is doing is legal, but it is a loophole to massively reduce her tax burden. Lord Goldsmith gave up non-dom status because it doesn’t fit with being a minister of state. She isn’t that, but she is the wife of the Chancellor. Morals, ethics should come into play and the simple request for transparency should be respected and delivered by Sunak. So if she is paying the correct tax on overseas earnings to India then that should be end of story. However, her PR said she’s paying ‘international tax’. That sounds like code for British Virgin Islands.
Tossers like Lord Rothermere pay little tax because he takes advantage of being a non-dom, despite being British and living in splendour half a mile from me he is wealthy enough to game the system. But then he isn’t a politician or married to the government. But the question is do you want to be governed by people with elastic ethics?
A foreign national living and earning in the UK will pay tax in the UK. That includes Mrs Sunak - who does exactly that. But that isn’t the point being discussed here, she lives in UK and this money is earned, and crucially remains, outside of the UK. I do agree with you that if she isn’t paying the right tax to India then that needs explaining.