The Conservative Party

Given the utter contempt in which they hold us I'm surprised things have stayed as peaceful as they have. Politically I'm probably angrier now than I've ever been and that includes the Thatcher era. They need to be (metaphorically) driven into the sea never to return.

I'm surprised there hasn't been more civil unrest, normally you would say that was a good thing but it just shows how pathetically apathetic us brits are.
 
Given the utter contempt in which they hold us I'm surprised things have stayed as peaceful as they have. Politically I'm probably angrier now than I've ever been and that includes the Thatcher era. They need to be (metaphorically) driven into the sea never to return.
I think it is universally accepted that they will be out at the next GE. I don't just want them out, I want them obliterated such they have none, if any influence in the HoC.
 
I'm surprised there hasn't been more civil unrest, normally you would say that was a good thing but it just shows how pathetically apathetic us brits are.

There's been an exponential rise in the availability of information and misinformation since I was young. I wonder if people are a combination of (a) overwhelmed by it all, then compounded by (b) lulled into thinking that having a rant on social media is meaningful.
 
356 asylum seekers arrive in a single day. (Daily Mail.)

Maximum to be sent to Rwanda, if the scheme gets go-ahead = 200. (Cost of £ millions.)

Asylum seekers from Rwanda under the scheme = 200 with 'complex needs'.

And this is a solution? Am I missing something?
It was a solution, but probably not the final solution Suella had in mind.
 
356 asylum seekers arrive in a single day. (Daily Mail.)

Maximum to be sent to Rwanda, if the scheme gets go-ahead = 200. (Cost of £ millions.)

Asylum seekers from Rwanda under the scheme = 200 with 'complex needs'.

And this is a solution? Am I missing something?
Yes. You are missing the simple fact that lines two and three of your post are never discussed in headline articles.
The public fell for Brexit because the big bus (and non-existent oven-ready deals) hid the detailed contracts, built up over 40+ years, that would need to be renegotiated.
The simple facts of the Rwanda plan are hidden behind the headline in line one. The voters won't see the details if the don't want to look.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.