The Grauniad today

[BlueAnorak]

So in summary:
Nobody is allowed to criticise anyone who happens to be Jewish - including when the criticism has got nothing to do with their ethnicity or religious belief - because it automatically becomes antisemitic.

In other words, there is free use of the Antisemitism Card which can be used at any opportunity to criticise anyone we don't like.

Those who support Israel's apartheid have created an environment where the Card can be used liberally as a cheap way to smear decent people and it's actually sickening. It belittles the impact of actual antisemitism - including the horrors of the Holocaust.

Genuine antisemitism is, of course, disgusting and evil. But so is weaponising it, especially in circumstances where there is no antisemitism present.

Kind of depends if you use Jewish Tropes, big nose, money etc.
You know its as anti semetic as it comes and seemingly don't care.
No suprise that's the left at the moment.

 

[BlueAnorak]

Martin Rowson apologised after he was accused of using “notorious anti-Semitic tropes” in an illustration about Richard Sharp’s resignation as BBC chairman.
He has since been branded “insincere” after it emerged that he also said any “offence was in the eye of the beholder”.
No suprise, the left can't be racists, apparantly, even though they behave in exactly the same way with the Arab semitism against MCFC's owner and chairman.
Arabs are victims and rich ones can't come over here and run a business better than anyone else. It's not allowed.

 

[Postman Pep]

Kind of depends if you use Jewish Tropes, big nose, money etc.
You know its as anti semetic as it comes and seemingly don't care.
No suprise that's the left at the moment.

Even less of surprise that free speech warriors choose which particular cartoons they get agitated over.

Cartoonists use exaggerated features, for example there were a few about Biden the other week that could be deemed as anti Irish. I also saw a montage of Diane Abbott cartoons the other day, with all sorts of exaggerated features and, if you insisted on getting triggered, hidden meanings.

But yeah 'the left'. As if the fucking Guardian is anyway representative of the left.

 

[Postman Pep]

Handy reminder. Don't be like Piers and choose when and not to be offended.by a cartoon:)

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

Kind of depends if you use Jewish Tropes, big nose, money etc.
You know its as anti semetic as it comes and seemingly don't care.
No suprise that's the left at the moment.

Pathetic. It's racist to point out a rich former banker is a rich former banker if he happens to be Jewish.

It wasn't clear the heads were puppets anyway, cartoonists aren't known for subtlety, why leave out the strings or glove hole?

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

Even less of surprise that free speech warriors choose which particular cartoons they get agitated over.

Cartoonists use exaggerated features, for example there were a few about Biden the other week that could be deemed as anti Irish. I also saw a montage of Diane Abbott cartoons the other day, with all sorts of exaggerated features and, if you insisted on getting triggered, hidden meanings.

But yeah 'the left'. As if the fucking Guardian is anyway representative of the left.

Why expect anything different from the gammons?

 

[BlueAnorak]

Pathetic. It's racist to point out a rich former banker is a rich former banker if he happens to be Jewish.

It wasn't clear the heads were puppets anyway, cartoonists aren't known for subtlety, why leave out the strings or glove hole?

Even some Guardian commentators think it's piled full of anti-semetic tropes.

Richard Sharp is a public figure and fair game for satire. The use of antisemitic tropes is not | Dave Rich

The Guardian was right to remove and delete the cartoon published on Saturday, says Dave Rich, head of policy at the Community Security Trust

www.theguardian.com

 

[blueinsa]

Pathetic. It's racist to point out a rich former banker is a rich former banker if he happens to be Jewish.

It wasn't clear the heads were puppets anyway, cartoonists aren't known for subtlety, why leave out the strings or glove hole?

Keep on digging.

At this rate you will be reaching yet another new username.

 

[Metal Biker]

Nothing amuses me more than non-Jewish people telling Jewish people what does and does not constitute anti-semitism. :)

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Nothing amuses me more than non-Jewish people telling Jewish people what does and does not constitute anti-semitism. :)

Quite. Was just about to post the same.

And they're probably the same people who see every nuance of racism involving the colour of one's skin and would come out with "How can you say that's not racist?".