chris85mcfc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 5,877
I'm not sure it's specifically just a Cheltenham Festival issue with Mullins, the bigger picture is the impact it has on Racing as a whole.The issues with Cheltenham shouldn't be directed towards Mullins, he's not done anything wrong. He's built a very effective and successful training operation working within the rules provided.
The decline of the Cheltenham Festival lies elsewhere.
The focus should be directed primarily to The Jockey Club and questions asked as to why it has become the Cheltenham Festival it is today.
The issue is highlighted further at Cheltenham as its the showcase event, where you are correct in that he is doing nothing wrong, other than entering horses into races which he believes have a chance of winning.
The question really, should be is this good for the sport, and is there anything that can be done by the HRI to ensure fair competition and reducing monopolies in the sport; and the knock on issues this creates in racing as a whole.
As things stand I don't believe there is any such legislation, so owners such as JP, Ricci et al will continue to pay the best person in the business the money he deserves to deliver them a winner.