There are roughly 70 million people in the UK. About half are in favour of the monarchy, safe assumption that a quarter of that half are staunch royalists. Let's say half of that staunch bunch are Mail zealots who buy into their manipulative propaganda. Now let's be conservative and say I'm a couple of million out, that would still leave roughly two million people. So, yeh, I stand by my claim. Millions.Millions eh?
lol
When you assume you make an ass of u and me!There are roughly 70 million people in the UK. About half are in favour of the monarchy, safe assumption that a quarter of that half are staunch royalists. Let's say half of that staunch bunch are Mail zealots who buy into their manipulative propaganda. Now let's be conservative and say I'm a couple of million out, that would still leave roughly two million people. So, yeh, I stand by my claim. Millions.
But it is the root of the point being made - they are racist and misogynistic, yet they are the widest read newspaper in the UK. That is why they know that they can target Meghan to generate profit.Don't worry about it :)
You should know, you read it yourself.But it is the root of the point being made - they are racist and misogynistic, yet they are the widest read newspaper in the UK. That is why they know that they can target Meghan to generate profit.
It’s definitely held us back as a nation. Difficult to argue otherwise.Our class system that breeds this is insane, and them at the top fruitcakes
The Mail is the widest read “news” website in the U.K. and the 11th most visited website overall. Bluemoon is in 3000th place roughly and RAWK is about 4000th. Comparisons are really stupid.You should know, you read it yourself.
Are you a regular Daily Mail reader? Do you agree with its stance on everything its editor publishes?
If you know it to be a racist and misognynistic publication, why are you reading the comment section expecting to find a varied difference of opinion that would challenge your perceptions of it being anything but?
Hence the point; you read RAWK, expect pro-Liverpool sentiment. Read the Daily Mail, expect vile comments regarding this topic. But the majority of the British public do not, so don't share such views. You're letting your passion run wild.
the mails average readership is 2.18 million with an average age of 58 and mqde up 2 thirds by people in the upper to middle class sections of society.There are roughly 70 million people in the UK. About half are in favour of the monarchy, safe assumption that a quarter of that half are staunch royalists. Let's say half of that staunch bunch are Mail zealots who buy into their manipulative propaganda. Now let's be conservative and say I'm a couple of million out, that would still leave roughly two million people. So, yeh, I stand by my claim. Millions.
I am not sure you understand the wider point, but that's okay, we can disagree.You should know, you read it yourself.
Are you a regular Daily Mail reader? Do you agree with its stance on everything its editor publishes?
If you know it to be a racist and misogynistic publication, why are you reading the comment section expecting to find a varied difference of opinion that would challenge your perceptions of it being anything but?
Hence the point; you read RAWK, expect pro-Liverpool sentiment. Read the Daily Mail, expect vile comments regarding this topic. But the majority of the British public do not, so don't share such views. You're letting your passion run wild.
Ah the comeback of the tosspot...I am not sure you understand the wider point, but that's okay, we can disagree.
Someone has been on a ninth rate training course and remembered the most stupid element.When you assume you make an ass of u and me!