The Harry and Meghan fuss

[fulabeer]

Well well, it turns out Harry was telling the truth about William striking him as new pictures emerge. Must be genuine as they are on the internet.

 

[metalblue]

He's apparently best ghostwriter in the world

Who is Harry's celebrated ghostwriter, JR Moehringer?

The Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist is the creme de la creme of celebrity ghostwriters.

www.bbc.co.uk

Not sure they can be that good when on late show Harry was saying was shocked by fallout from his 25 claim and that the press took it out of context when they’d quoted the passage directly from the book. Perhaps the ghostwriter got it wrong. Someone new to blame…

 

[metalblue]

You want to try reading some of his posts, and you’ll find the same dearth in quality as quantity.

I was just making a general point. I don’t click on peoples profile unless they’re after a ticket I have as I like to look after long standing members first. Bit stalkerish really.

 

[wolviedinho]

The power of the media nearly had me with this Harry/Megan situation. First up I don’t like the moaning by either but especially by Harry having lived and been part of the royal family. He was lucky to be born into such a wealthy family and has led I believe a charmed life for the most part or maybe he has lived in a prison without bars. I will go for the former for now.

Now, I always thought of him as the most relatable. He has made plenty of mistake and behaved questionably at times but who hasn’t?
I don’t mind the royal family and I do tend to believe his version of events. He seems ok albeit a little screwed up but again who isn’t?

The media are a pack of lying cunts. It don’t make Harry or Megan saints. The latter are doing it for their own personal reasons which have changed over time but ultimately whether those reasons are about money or privacy or mental health they are their own reasons. Two things the Sussex’s and the media have in common is money. Both want lots of it and secondly both want to control the narrative.

Overall it’s something we should applaud Harry for doing. As city fans we know what it’s like to have the mob relentlessly try and damage something we love.

Glad I read up on it and didn’t just take it at face value but also I would be glad not to read any more from Harry or Megan. Living in the grey is better than taking an absolute position based on limited knowledge.

Now I am off to the match day thread where I can find solace with a bunch of blue nutters and the odd hidden rag/scouse causing trouble -:)

Ffs Harry!

 

[SJT]

700 messages in over a decade - you are nothing more than a sad little troll.

get a life. take a paranoid pill

 

[domalino]

Not sure they can be that good when on late show Harry was saying was shocked by fallout from his 25 claim and that the press took it out of context when they’d quoted the passage directly from the book. Perhaps the ghostwriter got it wrong. Someone new to blame…

You haven’t read the passage have you?

The whole point is that the tabloids misrepresented what was in the book and that they didn’t quote it directly.

 

[Brewster's millions]

Is this one flew over the Cukoos nest - do one.

If it was One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, I’d say @BlueHammer85 was Charlie Cheswick, only he’d be trying to stop everyone from ganging up on Prince Harry rather than Harding.

Although, having said that, looking at how many posts people had made over a certain timeframe does strike me as the sort of thing Harding himself would do.

 

[SJT]

You want to try reading some of his posts, and you’ll find the same dearth in quality as quantity.

Burn the witch, eh? well done Aristotle

 

[fulabeer]

I think he is all over the show. Vardy came across as all reasonable.
Just her facts didn't add up.
Although the Royal are unlikely to respond, you can bet they will do it by other means.

All they have to do is fact check his stories.
You have to remember that all this is "his truths". In that it is how he saw things.
That doesn't mean it actually happened that way.

Just an example:
"Another claim made in Spare is that Harry was at Eton when he was called by a courtier and told that his great-grandmother, the Queen Mother, had died in 2002.

Robert Jobson — royal editor for the Evening Standard — has alleged that Harry is mistaken on this point, and Harry actually found out whilst on a skiing holiday in Klosters, Switzerland when she died on 30 March that year.

"Harry recalls in graphic detail learning of the Queen Mother's death at Eton in 2002. He wasn’t there. He was in Klosters, Switzerland skiing with his dad and brother at the time", Jobson tweeted, "I know because I was there at the time. Factual errors in your own memoir make you doubt 'his truth'."

 

[mackenzie]

I think he is all over the show. Vardy came across as all reasonable.
Just her facts didn't add up.
Although the Royal are unlikely to respond, you can bet they will do it by other means.

All they have to do is fact check his stories.
You have to remember that all this is "his truths". In that it is how he saw things.
That doesn't mean it actually happened that way.

Just an example:
"Another claim made in Spare is that Harry was at Eton when he was called by a courtier and told that his great-grandmother, the Queen Mother, had died in 2002.

Robert Jobson — royal editor for the Evening Standard — has alleged that Harry is mistaken on this point, and Harry actually found out whilst on a skiing holiday in Klosters, Switzerland when she died on 30 March that year.

"Harry recalls in graphic detail learning of the Queen Mother's death at Eton in 2002. He wasn’t there. He was in Klosters, Switzerland skiing with his dad and brother at the time", Jobson tweeted, "I know because I was there at the time. Factual errors in your own memoir make you doubt 'his truth'."

"Recollections may vary" is actually a good and reasonable argument.

Seen it in many situations. There's always another point of view