The Harry and Meghan fuss

Maybe it’s someone he’s met and has first hand knowledge of unlike Clarkson who admits he’s never met her.

I don’t know if anyone in here who would have any problem with Clarkson disliking her if he’d actually had a run in with her. He hasn’t so really his opinion is invalid.
Well no one on here has met any of the fuckers but opinions are rife. I expect you to remind them of this on a regular basis going forward.
 
Only when I'm wound up ;-) I've never been completely vile though.

It's just the whole hypocrisy over social media that gets me....the #bekind and virtue signalling. Whilst attacking people with real vitriol. The people they haven't met.

It's probably worth another thread to discuss though.
I think letting off steam on here or down the pub with your mates about famous people is different to doing it to a platform of potentially millions - Clarkson for example the other week - as it’s hardly going to get back to the people in question.
 
"Loathsome toad, I gathered. Everyone who knew her was in full agreement that she was an infected pustule on the arse of humanity, plus a s**t excuse for a journalist."

A quote from Harry in his book about a journo. Now maybe she deserves such, many do as we well know. But is that any less 'shocking' than Clarkson's comments about Markle?

NB, before the right on anarchists pile on, no, I am not a Royalist in the slightest, just baffled by all the utter hand wringing faux outrage bollocks about what he said about her ... :-)

Yes it is less shocking than what Clarkson wrote.

I am beginning to think they should get Alan Partridge to do the audiobook version of the book though. That quote would be brilliant!
 
"Loathsome toad, I gathered. Everyone who knew her was in full agreement that she was an infected pustule on the arse of humanity, plus a s**t excuse for a journalist."

A quote from Harry in his book about a journo. Now maybe she deserves such, many do as we well know. But is that any less 'shocking' than Clarkson's comments about Markle?

NB, before the right on anarchists pile on, no, I am not a Royalist in the slightest, just baffled by all the utter hand wringing faux outrage bollocks about what he said about her ... :-)

Agreed.

It’s the staggering hypocrisy on display here that will kill you!
 
I think letting off steam on here or down the pub with your mates about famous people is different to doing it to a platform of potentially millions - Clarkson for example the other week - as it’s hardly going to get back to the people in question.

And I do understand that, honestly.

Yet I bet Harry and Meghan scour anything and everything written about them. It's part of their problem I think.

So here is my message to them .....#fuckoff.
 
Yeah but like it's different if they deserve it like those fuckers I hate like.

Not like lovely Meg who I call Meg like coz she's like one of the family or a bestie to me innit.

Listen here pal…….the sooner you accept some folk are fair game whilst others are not, the better ok!
 
Yes.
And she’s the king’s step-daughter-in-law anyway.
Step daughter in law is a rumour that goes around social media, I find it extremely bad taste to insinuate that Charles is not Harry’s father purely because Harry resembles the Spencer’s. He looks like the Queen as well to me. There is no evidence to suppose otherwise social media tries to convince people that Diana had an affair but she wasn’t stupid neither was he during that affair it doesn’t mean he was Harry’s father
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.