The Harry and Meghan fuss

[Kirkstall Blue]

 

[Cheeky Txiki]

 

[Kirkstall Blue]

I’m not sure it’s a real medal looks a little tacky 400 guests received one..

 

[bluethrunthru]

"according to a source" - ie what the author of the piece dreamed up

 

[daveoswald]

I have no problem with Markle she is what she is. Harry however is the lowest of the low, he essentially lives by washing the families dirty lining in public, i don't care who you are you do not rubbish you're own, especially some one who's mother died trying to avoid press intrusion into her life looking for a nip slip.

 

[oldius]

The people still talking about Meghan and Harry do it because it makes them money. People like Angela Levin, Lady Colin Cambell and their acolytes will offer spin without substance, usually bilious, because that's what their audience wants. They are given platforms on the Daily Mail and GBNews because that is what the viewers and readers of those channels demand. They tweet furiously and earn money because the people reading their stuff want to take in the bile.

Recently, the Byline Times conducted an investigation and found that an aide of Prince WIlliam was feeding stories about Meghan and Archie to the press. He was named in court papers by Prince Harry. When Harry refused to remove his name from the court papers, King Charles cut him off, hence Megxit. The aforementioned Angela Levin and Lady C have nothing to say on the matter because they do not want to talk about a genuine investigation, and their listeners don't want to know it anyway. What it revealed is a father who will dump his son to protect the Royal Family's relationship with the press. Still, there are far more important things going on in the world than this soap opera.

Exploding 'Megxit': Our Royalty and Press Paint a Distorted Portrait of Britain – Byline Times

In its first retail print edition available in shops, Byline Times reveals what the story of Prince Harry and Meghan's departure from the Royal Family raises about power and identity, monarchy and modernity in Britain today

bylinetimes.com

 

[Trickyblues]

I have no problem with Markle she is what she is. Harry however is the lowest of the low, he essentially lives by washing the families dirty lining in public, i don't care who you are you do not rubbish you're own, especially some one who's mother died trying to avoid press intrusion into her life looking for a nip slip.

What if he did it through “sources” and “royal aides” through the sun and daily mail and telegraph like his family did about him? Do you prefer that?

 

[west didsblue]

Trump supporting Musk fan tweets negatively about Harry & Meghan citing unnamed sources.

Why post a clearly fabricated story?

 

[west didsblue]

What if he did it through “sources” and “royal aides” through the sun and daily mail and telegraph like his family did about him? Do you prefer that?

Was just about to post the same. He deserves credit for not going down the “unnamed sources” route.

 

[BlueHammer85]

I have no problem with Markle she is what she is. Harry however is the lowest of the low, he essentially lives by washing the families dirty lining in public, i don't care who you are you do not rubbish you're own, especially some one who's mother died trying to avoid press intrusion into her life looking for a nip slip.

Bollox
I'd turn my back on my family if they treated my wife the same and i'd counter all the pro Royal media narrative by telling my side of the story. That's all he's done.