gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
strongbowholic said:Now you are putting words in my mouth. I asked a question and made no defence of any position. For the examples given, it is an occupational hazard, but certainly not "tough shit" if that hazard came upon them; that's just adding emotion into the debate.gordondaviesmoustache said:strongbowholic said:Indeed. "These are the risks involved, sign on the dotted line if you wish to continue." Unless of course you are saying that (as with a significantly large number of prostitutes) people are forced into becoming soldiers or footballers against their own free will and are not fully aware of the risks involved.
Well I would have imagined by virtue of the fact that I was making the other two jobs analogous with the army that you would have realised that I wasn't trying to say that.
What about aid workers that get murdered?
Construction workers crushed by faulty machinery?
They know the risks. Tough shit for them too I guess?
What about CSO's who refuse to save a drowning member of the public because it's not in their job description. Presumably you are happy to defend them because they are exercising their free will and have evaluated the risks involved.
To my mind in those situations saying 'it's an occupational hazard' and 'tough shit' are equivalent to each other and equally lacking in empathy.
And to be fair I don't think I've added any more emotion to this debate than was already present.