Not likely considering the website and 3rd shirtI can’t ever recall the term Man City being use before the 1970s. It was either Manchester City or more usually City. Even my Gradfather from Shropshire would use the term City. Birmingham City and Stoke City were referred to as Birmingham and Stoke.
I think that Manchester City are the only City from a two team area with a rival having the same geographical handle. Stoke had Port Vale, Birmingham had Villa as local rivals. Leicester, Norwich, d Coventry have no rivals from the same city. Neither have Bradford City since the demise of Bradford Park Avenue.
It works similarly with Manchester United as few refer to Leeds, Newcastle, West Ham, etc. as United. Sheffield United are the only likely conflict.
I suspect that the Man City name crept in as City started to become less relevant in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Hopefully it will fall into disuse as long as City are a dominant team.
It is a highly fictionalised version of Trautmann’s life not an exact true story and should be judged as such.The fact that Jock Thompson was still manager through to at least 1956 in the film when he'd left in 1950 and Les Mc Dowell took over was one bit. Also the circumstances of his young sons tragic death were completely different
Poetic license. The keeping of Jock as the manager throughout would have helped the narrative.It is a highly fictionalised version of Trautmann’s life not an exact true story and should be judged as such.
Aside from the Jock Thomson/Les McDowall issue, Bert was married after he signed for City not before. Bert was released from the POW camp before he played for St Helens. Jack Friar was never the yokel that John Henshaw portrayed him as. The list goes on.
Despite the above, it remains a great film. Just don’t take anything too seriously.
You can be certain that I flagged absolutely everything, working significantly longer on this than the £500 they gave me justified. The bottom line is that I was only a consultant, not the author, not the producer and not the people providing the funding. ManCity was definitely something I flagged but then so was the fact Thomson was not the manager; that the badge was not the Manchester COA; that the black & white archive footage was not for the games suggested or chronological and much much more.After the film last night I went to Youtube to find the '56 cup final as I was irritated by the "Man City" references in the commentary.
The real footage referred to ourselves as Manchester who were playing Birmingham. At no point ever we we referred to as "Man City". I can only assume it was put down to "Artistic licence" though @garyjames I am suprised you allowed that to slip in under the radar.
To be fair there’s so many other things I’d have changed first too. For example the whole reason why City took a gamble on Trautmann was not discussed and put across as a ‘Swift wants to retire’ piece rather than ‘shit. Swift’s replacements are crap or ill and Swift has said he’ll come back for 6 games and that’s it! We need a keeper. Any Keeper!’I think you are over estimating Gary's role in the film here! He wasn't the executive producer.
I definitely pointed this out so please don’t assume I didn’t. Personally I’m more irritated by the fact the war stuff is completely fabricated.Yes I know but thought as an adviser he may have had an input....? It really did sand out like a sore thumb to me, to the point of being bloody irritating and spoiling the film.
Perhaps the Executive Producer had rag leanings?
BristolI think that Manchester City are the only City from a two team area with a rival having the same geographical handle. Stoke had Port Vale, Birmingham had Villa as local rivals. Leicester, Norwich, d Coventry have no rivals from the same city. Neither have Bradford City since the demise of Bradford Park Avenue.
I flagged the Thomson stuff. The producer didn’t have a clue and the writers were German and based everything on what Bert told them. I kicked off about this quite a bit saying that Thomson was a bit part player in the story and should be replaced by McDowall. I was told ‘but we’ve picked the actor and he’s Scottish!’ I said ‘no problem, McDowall was Scottish too!’I thought that too, about the manager, missed it when I first saw it.
It is always an issue when folk very close to the subject or with a lot of knowledge of the subject see it all laid out in a film.
I watched that Morrissey (I know, I know) biopic the other year and picked holes in it (they used the house the other side of his semi-detached on Kings Road, Stretford for his house for example) and the next day I watched it again without getting worked up about "small things" and enjoyed it.