The Labour Government

[johnnytapia]

Loving the tears of our resident Tory boys. Weep on

Not heard a fucking peep from them for months! Now smashing fuck out of their bitter keyboards. Beautiful

 

[The Future’s Blue!]

“The vast majority of people are thick. Lets say there are approaching 68 million people in the UK.”
Let’s say the vast majority of people are thick. And don’t know how to use an apostrophe (eight-year-old stuff).

He’s just angry. I was a starter business, and more, back in the nineties but felt that public service was for me. I moved on leaving a good business plan in place and took a huge drop in lifestyle to make the change. However, this thick fucker managed to make it with the other thick fuckers and has a decent wage.

People, like you are quoting, are more of lucky fucks who made it because of conditions at the the time and can’t, or won’t, diversify because they are locked in with their limited scope, scared of what the markets will bring.

 

[The Future’s Blue!]

Not heard a fucking peep from them for months! Now smashing fuck out of their bitter keyboards. Beautiful

Where’s that gif?

 

[johnnytapia]

They pay tax and the tax contributes to their salaries.

Yes salary. Most public sector workers get paid once a month not every week.



You prove yourself wrong. Why should anyone waste any effort on a world view based on the collective sketches of two Harry Enfield characters?

I get paid every month.

He’s just angry. I was a starter business, and more, back in the nineties but felt that public service was for me. I moved on leaving a good business plan in place and took a huge drop in lifestyle to make the change. However, this thick fucker managed to make it with the other thick fuckers and has a decent wage.

People, like you are quoting, are more of lucky fucks who made it because of conditions at the the time and can’t, or won’t, diversify because they are locked in with their limited scope, scared of what the markets will bring.

I’ve worked in both private and public sector. Both are necessary; both have positives and negatives.
I know which we need most though.

 

[Rascal]

The vast majority of people are thick.

Says you

Lets say there are approaching 68 million people in the UK

Correct, it is forcasted to decline by 2050

. Only 25 million are business owners or private sector workers. That means that the balance are public sector workers, students, kids, pensioners. or non economic contributors. Lets hammer the most productive and intelligent of that 25 million to keep funding the rest!

You need to check your figures.

Madness - absolute madness. The upper 10% of that 25 million will just have less incentive to graft, take risks, create

Can you explain why? because not one Economist i have ever read supports this notion.

money save etc.

If you have less propensity to spend you damage Economic growth

om
The problem with socialism every time is you eventually run our of other peoples money. If anyone can prove me wrong on that i will applaud them.

In 1945 when Labour took over a country that was -256% GDP , they used Keynesian economics to borrow and invest. They built the NHS, They built millions of homes, they created the welfare state, it produced an economic boom that led to a Conservative PM saying "we have never had it so good"

The post WW2 social concensus created the boom years of our country, we built Concorde, we were leading the world in innovation, but who lost out out?

The wealthy lost out so they backed neo-liberalism and created a state that is now one of the most unequal societies in the world. The wealth of the super rich and parts of Manchester are amongst the most deprived parts of the country.

The problem with Socialism is people with excess wealth will have to part with some of it for the betterment of the people.

 

[ROCKET80]

High tax / high public sector economies don't work!

Finland
Sweden
Denmark
Norway

All of them not working.

 

[hilts]

Only a **** would read it like, so, get fucked, knobhead ;-)

There you go again, one trick pony who turns out to be a nasty fucker reveals himself and reacts accordingly.

 

[hilts]

I’ve already answered that.

You really didn't, no one answers it because they can't, like when you ask numbers just silence or deflection.

 

[hilts]

1800 - 1 billion
1960 - 3 billion

15th November 2022 it reached 8 billion

2050 expected to be 9.7 billion and possibly peaking at 10.4 billion mid 2080's

It's expected to be 9 billion in 2037 which does mean it is slowing somewhat.

Phew

 

[Worsleyweb]

Says you

Correct, it is forcasted to decline by 2050

You need to check your figures.

Can you explain why? because not one Economist i have ever read supports this notion.

If you have less propensity to spend you damage Economic growth

In 1945 when Labour took over a country that was -256% GDP , they used Keynesian economics to borrow and invest. They built the NHS, They built millions of homes, they created the welfare state, it produced an economic boom that led to a Conservative PM saying "we have never had it so good"

The post WW2 social concensus created the boom years of our country, we built Concorde, we were leading the world in innovation, but who lost out out?

The wealthy lost out so they backed neo-liberalism and created a state that is now one of the most unequal societies in the world. The wealth of the super rich and parts of Manchester are amongst the most deprived parts of the country.

The problem with Socialism is people with excess wealth will have to part with some of it for the betterment of the people.

Why were we then known as the sick man of Europe during the time you refer to?