The Labour Government

[WRicko]

No they are still bloody well here.

So you where wrong

 

[Vic]

The depressing thing is that 'the right people' wouldn't touch a green or red bench with their arses. instead we get the likes of Nandy who has to apologise for breaking the rules. I can't see how she has broken the rules 'cos don't they, like PiGMOL, make up the rules as they go along. The current crop of politicians do not give a tuppenny fuck for the prosperity of the nation and its people, rather how can we lie and cheat our way to another election victory or kick out the current incumbents, and so it goes on!

I've long been of the opinion that the job is too big for politicians and long serving civil servants

Everything in the world has changed over the years or been modernised but the political system remains largely the same.

Point scoring to feather their own nests.

I would take all economic decisions off them.

How are we going to select these paragons of business virtue to look after our interests?

 

[TinFoilHat]

The silence from Keith over a foreign leader trying to influence the State broadcast is deafening.

 

[mosssideblue]

If you’re not working, and you are living off benefits, don’t have kids you can’t afford to bring up and pay for. Why should tax payers subsidise the children of parents who aren’t working and aren’t paying into the system that keeps their kids fed, watered, clothed, etc. I’m sure those parents will be more than happy to vote for Labour at the next general election after receiving more money off the already hard pressed government and tax payer for their additional children that their parents can’t provide for without free state benefits. Anyone would think there’s a bottomless pit of money, even though Reeves is about to make tax increases, and is finding every way possible to take more money off hard working people.

So you would. Ok

 

[Gray]

So you where wrong

Where or were?

 

[hilts]

How are we going to select these paragons of business virtue to look after our interests?

Its what you replace them with, that's the problem.

Do keep up :-)

 

[Ifwecouldjust.......]

It astonishes me that in a democratic country, the electorate don't have the means to go on a website to see exactly where their money is going and who it is going to in an easy to read system and graph.

It would eliminate a lot of the bickering between the parties on any of the money issues and would allow the public to decipher fully and question any parties ambitions of changing the spending.

Any money investigated or caught off the books should equal a permanent expulsion from that party ever getting back into power with it's leaders put in a courtroom for trials of corruption and treason.

Published every year .... plus those that are Self Employed get a link once their tax submission has been accepted.

How public spending was calculated in your tax summary

www.gov.uk

 

[Ifwecouldjust.......]

If you’re not working, and you are living off benefits, don’t have kids you can’t afford to bring up and pay for. Why should tax payers subsidise the children of parents who aren’t working and aren’t paying into the system that keeps their kids fed, watered, clothed, etc. I’m sure those parents will be more than happy to vote for Labour at the next general election after receiving more money off the already hard pressed government and tax payer for their additional children that their parents can’t provide for without free state benefits. Anyone would think there’s a bottomless pit of money, even though Reeves is about to make tax increases, and is finding every way possible to take more money off hard working people.

Rob Burrows holding on line one .......wasn't his fault he fell ill mate.