The Labour Government

Sir Patrick Vallance given a peerage and appointed Minister of State for Science.
I don't think he has a party affiliation, so presumably they want him to give even-handed advice.
 
Sir Patrick Vallance given a peerage and appointed Minister of State for Science.
I don't think he has a party affiliation, so presumably they want him to give even-handed advice.

Starmer has said that his government will be free from the trappings of ideology and he wants to put people in roles for the sole purpose that they will be effective in those roles. He’s basically wanting to turn the government into a technocracy.

So far I have to say his appointments are demonstrating that. Timpson and now Vallance are great appointments.

I’m all for it and no doubt not all of them will be a success but I think Starmer will at least give them some time and stability that the civil service has sorely needed. It’s the opposite of the “country has had enough of experts” garbage we’ve had from incompetent Tory ministers who weren’t fit for their office.
 
It’s the opposite of the “country has had enough of experts” garbage we’ve had from incompetent Tory ministers who weren’t fit for their office.
All children who didn't like being told no.

Starmer wants expert advice so he can make the best, most informed decisions.

I've got his next campaign slogan...

Boring is Brilliant.
 
But get an agreement then move on to the same with the RMT in the first couple of weeks and you make the Tories look like abso

No fee paying schools will be open tomorrow - mostly coz its weekend but the Mail and the Telegraph won't car about the details

Yep and 100 of millions pissed up the wall by the the tories on it!
And hundreds of millions of sub Sarafian Africans planning too make the move north, how many do you want?
































/
 
He has a massive mandate built on sand, he got a lower percentage of the vote than Corbyn, albeit there are mitigating factors.

His majority though means he can really enact proper change and if he is a Socialist as he claims he could make life changing change.

I doubt that will happen, Labour are a party of neo=liberalism,cunts like Reeves and Streeting are anathema to me as a lad on the true left and that horrible bastard Akehurst got elected, shame on you Durham.

I am delighted the Tories have been smashed, but i am not enthused by Starmer

Welcome to Labour austerity, the poor remain poor, the rich get ever richer.

What really concerns me as a democrat is how can a party who won only 33% of the vote on a turnout of around 50% really govern with legitimacy.

Our politics is broken, I hope Starmer fixes it, if he does not then the far right will fix it
You chose not to vote so spare us all the “What really concerns me as a democrat” bollocks.
 
He has a massive mandate built on sand, he got a lower percentage of the vote than Corbyn, albeit there are mitigating factors.

His majority though means he can really enact proper change and if he is a Socialist as he claims he could make life changing change.

I doubt that will happen, Labour are a party of neo=liberalism,cunts like Reeves and Streeting are anathema to me as a lad on the true left and that horrible bastard Akehurst got elected, shame on you Durham.

I am delighted the Tories have been smashed, but i am not enthused by Starmer

Welcome to Labour austerity, the poor remain poor, the rich get ever richer.

What really concerns me as a democrat is how can a party who won only 33% of the vote on a turnout of around 50% really govern with legitimacy.

Our politics is broken, I hope Starmer fixes it, if he does not then the far right will fix it
But as a democrat you couldn't even be bothered to vote Rascal. That's how much you care!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.