Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 14,849
I've never been a fan of party political conferences. Especially when in government. We don't pay them to pat each other on the back!
Are you as happy finding pensioners who are on the edge of freezing to death in winter or scared to put their heating on?Interesting.
Golden oldies: Are one in five pensioners millionaires? - Full Fact
A quarter of over 65s live in households with wealth above a million pounds.fullfact.org
Whichever way it’s done, I don’t expect it to be everyone claiming benefitsBe surprised if they were daft enough to have the money in a bank account, would be better looking at their physical assets or under their bed.
Yep. Return the sausages!!! I think we know what he's having for tea.
Are you as happy finding pensioners who are on the edge of freezing to death in winter or scared to put their heating on?
Surviving on under £12,000 per year and unable to claim pension credit?
Mathematically that is correct. The only issue being that the current top rate of tax kicks in at £125,000+ per year and a lot of people who earn more than that, have some flexibility in how they are paid, and will "rearrange" their earnings in order to pay less tax if the rates go up too much.Good argument in there for higher tax on higher incomes. They'll still be better off.
Even with your maths.
They're not all poor, either. Going round in circles, but of course no-one has said all pensioners are rich. Just that most are not poor.The fuck are you banging on about pensioners all being rich for? Are you that thick?
There are a reasonable number of salaried people who fall into the +125k bracket. What they maybe should do is limit the amount you can bung into pensions for people earning above that amount. E.g. for every £2 you earn above 125k, your allowance for your pension contributions reduces by £1 until it reaches the old threshold of £40k.Mathematically that is correct. The only issue being that the current top rate of tax kicks in at £125,000+ per year and a lot of people who earn more than that, have some flexibility in how they are paid, and will "rearrange" their earnings in order to pay less tax if the rates go up too much.
Last time we increased the top rate to 50%, the tax take from the demographic impacted, actually went down. And I think - though I am not 100% about this - it went up again when we reverted to 45%.
The Chuch of England is rich when it comes to estate and land but they don't have a pot to piss in when it comes to cash in the bank. Big difference.They're not all poor, either. Going round in circles, but of course no-one has said all pensioners are rich. Just that most are not poor.