Brewster's millions
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 5,332
His use of snippets of speeches was both desperate and misleading, and his delivery was especially poor. Stammering, uncertain and unconvincing.Starmer crushed her and you know it
The suggestion that the collapse of the case rested solely on the decisions of a middling civil servant is frankly ludicrous and his story changes everyday. Meetings that were initially denied are now admitted to have occurred and the timescale around what he claims to have known and when will change as well. Just like it did in the Mandelson affair in fact.
Why he expects anyone to believe a word he says at this stage is a bit of a mystery, but the stooges on here will doubtless lap it up.
Last edited:

