The Labour Government

[Vic]

Legal migration isn’t really in the news, illegal immigration is the main story.

BBC's top headline that one deported and desperate migrant comes back for another go.

 

[mancityvstoke]

Shit on pensioners, more than you already do, at your peril

 

[bluethrunthru]

Shit on pensioners, more then you already do, at your peril

shit on people aged 50 and younger is an even worse option - bluntly we are 4 years out from the next GE and that inevitably means there will be fewer of todays pensioners alive and voting in 4 years than there will be 16 - 50 year olds.

 

[mancityvstoke]

shit on people aged 50 and younger is an even worse option - bluntly we are 4 years out from the next GE and that inevitably means there will be fewer of todays pensioners alive and voting in 4 years than there will be 16 - 50 year olds.

Yeah that as well.......titanic party. Not the labour party I knew.
Shit leader and troughing MP's.

If you think they'll get voted back in you're mad.

 

[Metal Biker]

It's a bold strategy from Labour supporters to be all "Labour is what is best for the country" to "You fucking idiotic peons, voting against Labour?! We are your betters!" when they lose, and then wondering why people up and down the country have lost faith in the party.

It's not a good way to win people back.

 

[mosssideblue]

Yeah that as well.......titanic party. Not the labour party I knew.
Shit leader and troughing MP's.

If you think they'll get voted back in you're mad.

In your opinion, who will get voted in and, based on what?

 

[mancityvstoke]

In your opinion, who will get voted in and, based on what?

How the fuck do I know? Want the lottery numbers as well?

I reckon a coalition but Labour have well and truly fucked up .

 

[mosssideblue]

How the fuck do I know? Want the lottery numbers as well?

I reckon a coalition but Labour have well and truly fucked up .

You seem to know Labour wouldn't get in, so you know something

 

[mancityvstoke]

You seem to know Labour wouldn't get in, so you know something

you're just looking to bait and argue so you can do one pal

 

[mosssideblue]

you're just looking to bait and argue so you can do one pal

I asked you a genuine question and received a not too pleasant response. Why so tetchy

 

[mancityvstoke]

I asked you a genuine question and received a not too pleasant response. Why so tetchy

You've just had my response....why keep on?

 

[blueinsa]

So you'd have objected to Alexis Jay chairing the IICSA? A social work inspector?

We have been here before:

"The first two chairs appointed to the original panel inquiry were Baroness Butler-Sloss (appointed 8 July 2014, stepped down 14 July 2014). The reasons for their withdrawal in each case were objections related to their perceived closeness to individuals and establishments which would be investigated. There were also objections to the shape of the inquiry itself, concerning testimony, the scope of inquiry, and lack of ability to compel witnesses to testify. In December 2014, it was reported that Theresa May was reconsidering arrangements for the inquiry. On 4 February 2015, May announced that the inquiry would be chaired by Dame Lowell Goddard, a New Zealand High Court judge who had no ties to the UK bodies and persons likely to be investigated. The existing panel was disbanded, and the inquiry was given new powers as a statutory inquiry. Lowell Goddard resigned as chair in August 2016 and was replaced by Professor Alexis Jay."

It’s matters not a jot what you or I think.

The victims are speaking and they should be heard.

 

[moggymoz]

Soon........ :)

 

[mosssideblue]

You've just had my response....why keep on?

No probs grumpy ****

 

[mancityvstoke]

No probs grumpy ****

No need for that now is there gobby? Got owt else to say?

 

[mosssideblue]

No need for that now is there gobby? Got owt else to say?

Plenty, but it seems you’re not capable of debate without thinking posters are looking for an argument, so will leave you in peace and look towards more mature posters.

Toodle pip

 

[mancityvstoke]

Plenty, but it seems you’re not capable of debate without thinking posters are looking for an argument, so will leave you in peace and look towards more mature posters.

Toodle pip

You definitely don't want a debate and this isn't the Oxford debating society. It's a football forum ffs. Calling people cunts isn't going to win you any new friends is it?

Maturity says take it to PM............or better still put me on block.

I'll save you the trouble.

 

[mosssideblue]

You definitely don't want a debate and this isn't the Oxford debating society. It's a football forum ffs. Calling people cunts isn't going to win you any new friends is it?

Maturity says take it to PM............or better still put me on block.

I'll save you the trouble.

Following your statement that Labour are not going to win the next election, it seemed a reasonable question to ask you ( politely), who do you think will and for some reason you saw your arse and assumed I was looking for a barny.

Also, I never called you a ****

 

[Vic]

It’s matters not a jot what you or I think.

The victims are speaking and they should be heard.

Great.

"Phillips should go." "Phillips should stay."

Then what?

 

[Craig]

That’s like protesting that shoplifting is getting media coverage when the vast majority pay for their shopping

Not really, as shoplifting doesn’t have a media agenda behind it. Incidentally, if they took their head out of their arses with there current drug policy that is the definition of insanity. Then they could seriously reduce shoplifting and stop wasting so much money and resources on the ongoing circle of shit in a war they can never win.

Only 5% of immigration is people on boats yet the media constantly push a narrative that has sheep ready to vote for a racist because they think people on boats are the main reason they’re skint. Funny how inequality is avoided like plague from the mail and sun etc.