Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 69,767
We need a reset. We need a government that offers hope; not increasing cruelty.As far as I am concerned I dont want a fRW govn. Everyone loses then.
We need a reset. We need a government that offers hope; not increasing cruelty.As far as I am concerned I dont want a fRW govn. Everyone loses then.
The one's complaining the loudest about reforming the immigration system, will be the one's crying the loudest if reform wins the next election.As far as I am concerned I dont want a fRW govn. Everyone loses then.
Yep. I like the way he capitalises 'SO' in am effort to show us he's REALLY REALLY SERIOUS...What a load of reactionary shit. Complete with key words from the playbook.
For me, it’s a nightmare to even consider a Reform government, with a leader who looks up to the likes of Putin and Trump. To have people choosing for them, out of some sort of ideological view, sounds absolutley nuts to me.The one's complaining the loudest about reforming the immigration system, will be the one's crying the loudest if reform wins the next election.
They can't have it both ways. I don't want Farage and his not so merry band of lunatics running the country, it would be a complete disaster.
You should get a job as Trump’s speech writer.Our idiotic woke ideology is responsible for SO much damage. Hiring the wrong people due to idiotic DEI policies. Kids being taught that it's perfectly fine for men to want to become women. That it's right that a convicted sex offender cannot be deported because he might get persecuted in his own country. ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC. Starmer epitomises everything that is wrong with the country. And people now realise it, which is why he is the most unpopular prime minister on record.
As far as I am concerned I dont want a fRW govn. Everyone loses then.
I am quite impressed with Labour tbh. At least they are seeming to be doing something. And that's what the country needs, someone listening to them.
![]()
Key takeaways: What are the proposed asylum system reforms?
What we know so far about Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood's proposed reforms.www.bbc.co.uk
Not sure what you’re saying or what the proof would be of how other countries feel about asylum seekers they take but what you seem to be saying is no one wants to take anyone. Is that really acceptable morally ? Or sensible given the number of people who can die or be persecuted all over the world and need help.Your argument would hold some water if the countries you allude to were happy with the situation. They aren't either.
I’ve come to the conclusion that whatever Labour do, it will always be wrong to many. And that’s why the Tories/Reform will be back in charge very soon to once again, fuck the workers over.I've yet to see a country where the far right has been beaten by moving closer and closer to them in policy.
The fact Tommy Robinson and co. are celebrating this as a victory and claiming they've won tells you everything you need to know.
Some of the things in there are reasonable changes in the face of a worldwide increase in asylum seekers, but typical of this Labour govt they've gone so far in trying to appease the far right with some of the rhetoric they've lost half their own MPs, a load of their own voters, and the resulting chaos will just strengthen the far right, and not a single reform voter will switch to Labour because of this.
So you're closer to a fRW government this evening than you were this morning.
Is it a huge issue or is it just perceived as such ?You can all vote Green at the next election.
Every other party will try to deal with what is a huge issue for the nation.
All they’ll do is demand its 25 years for nationalisation and asylum check every 2.5 weeks.I’ve come to the conclusion that whatever Labour do, it will always be wrong to many. And that’s why the Tories/Reform will be back in charge very soon to once again, fuck the workers over.
Robinson, and alike, are not celebrating this, they are shitting themselves that Labour have come up with a plan that is acceptable to many and that counters their own. You’ll know this as you’ll see wall-to-wall from the normal RW media.
Set the standards high, ignore the rest that has no impact.All they’ll do is demand its 25 years for nationalisation and asylum check every 2.5 weeks.
Then when that’s implemented, 30 years and daily asylum checks.
Meanwhile, the real issues are ignored.
Your last phrase is the most pertinent.Set the standards high, ignore the rest that has no impact.
It’s a no win situation, how many have tried?
Sort the poverty crisis, the cost of living, just marginally, will do.
What people think are key issues and what actually are can be different also different questions and polls give different results what’s an issue for people or country as a whole for example1 they aint dealing with it, more like burying heads
2 We dont seem to have done well at stopping them
3 oh it's 6% this week is it:-)
4 housing, thank god only uk born people live in houses
5 Starmers Trump wraparound solves this how?
Its so tiny bluemoon talks about it endlessly and bloody reform are leading the polls.
And what do you think ? And if asylum seekers are such why ?This government disagrees with you.
It depends where you live. If you live in a very deprived small town like me in the North East that has taken approx 12,000 migrants - the majority who have settled across a relatively small number of central wards, yes it is. It massively changes the demographics of the town, puts a huge strain on services, creates a huge demand on the rental market which drives rental prices up (particularly as a proportion of the migrants are students) and generally speaking makes people feel less connected and less safe.Is it a huge issue or is it just perceived as such ?
Thanks!You should get a job as Trump’s speech writer.
But it isn't is it. Do you want your your 8 year old being told its' OK if he want to become a woman? I do not. Do you want companies blocking hiring of the most capable white male in favour of a less capable trans black "woman"? I don't want that either. Do you want people who could work choosing not to because they have been kidded into thinking that being stressed is not normal part of human life? Nope. Don't want that either. People being arrested because they said something that upset someone? FFS. How about not being able to send people to prison because there's no-one to feed their cat?What a load of reactionary shit. Complete with key words from the playbook.