Halfpenny said:Honestly don't see how this is at all relevant?
To be fair, women make up over half of the population, unlike the others you mention, so law of averages would say they should have had atleast one.peoffrey said:Lucky13 said:Why have they never had a female leader?
Or a non white one. Or a gay one. Or a wheelchair user. Besides, the Tories have only had one.
I'd plan to leave the UK by May 2015 at the latest then.Fuzzy Logic said:As long as they never get back in power then can have whoever they like as leader
I wouldn't be quite so sure.Skashion said:I'd plan to leave the UK by May 2015 at the latest then.Fuzzy Logic said:As long as they never get back in power then can have whoever they like as leader
There'd have to be a big upturn in the economy very soon so the effects are being felt in time for the election. We know there's a good two year drag before there's a knock-on effect from growth on employment and the like. The majority of cuts are still to come too: <a class="postlink" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303505504577402360002221288.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 21288.html</a> At the moment the poll leads indicate a substantial Labour majority: <a class="postlink" href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/</a> and I think it's just as likely to get worse for the tories as better. Plans to reform Parliament seem to be dead in the water as well. This is assuming Parliament lasts five years and it could well not. If it's earlier I think the tories are sitting ducks.SWP's back said:I wouldn't be quite so sure.