Because I responded to an out of context photo and followed that up by suggesting it was becoming a go to thing to prove people are wronguns because they’ve been photographed with a wrong’un.Again why did you not pushback against accusations of collusion with even less substance?
With who?Because I responded to an out of context photo and followed that up by suggesting it was becoming a go to thing to prove people are wronguns because they’ve been photographed with a wrong’un.
Corbyn was no different with the photos of him when he was LOTO.
At funerals, IRA etc.With who?
And ? If you are going out on a limb on out of context photos back up what you are pulling me up on?At funerals, IRA etc.
I think it’s a pointless exercise that helps no one, whether it be of Corbyn, Blair, Putin or Maxwell.And ? If you are going out on a limb on out of context photos back up what you are pulling me up on?
So why respond to my initial post,I think it’s a pointless exercise that helps no one, whether it be of Corbyn, Blair, Putin or Maxwell.
Asking what you were trying to prove in posting it.So why respond to my initial post,
Centrist liberals thinking they know better than anyone else and wondering why people refuse to listen and the end result is where we are ...... but it's never their fault......I find it humorous, the very folks that accused Corbyn of ties of terrorism because he attended an ambiguous funeral, find it hard to imply ties to Russia with Blair SMILING in a less ambiguous warm handshake embrace!
Hilarious!
Go back to the post I responded to it's not a difficult question.Asking what you were trying to prove in posting it.
It wasn’t a trick question.