I don't dislike Churchill and agree with you that he did make a valuable contributions during the war. But what I object to is the delibrate white washing in schools of all the bad shit that he did. He does have a place in British history but lets not hide the fact putting aside what he did in the war he was a right **** and had there not been the war would we still be arse licking his legacy?
I don’t disagree with that at all but the original reason we spoke about Churchill was a point you made about everyone ignoring his bad parts, whilst concentrating on Corbyn’s negatives.
My position is that Corbyn’s negatives outweigh his positives and he hasn’t accomplished a fraction of the good Churchill did for us.
He’s obviously not done anything as negative as Churchill did also so what I’m really saying is they’re not a good comparison.
It would be better to compare Churchill to other war time PM’s and Corbyn to other peace time opposition leaders.