The Maths Thread

Are there some fractions that have more equivalent fractions? The fact you can simply double and keep doubling every fraction would seem to indicate every fraction has an infinite number of equivalent fractions I.e 2/3 = 4/6 = 8/12
3/7 = 6/14 = 12/28 etc etc

But what about fractions that you can also divide to get a equivalent fraction:

4/6 = 8/12 = 16/24 etc etc ad infinitum but also 4/6 = 2/3

So does 4/6 have more equivalent fractions than 3/7?
Yes, because it has the same number of multiplied equivalent fractions (as many as you can be arsed with) and can also have 2/3.
 
3/4 = 6/8 and 21/28 - just one example of a fraction that isn't repetitively doubled.
 
Finished my online course. Usually graphs are rectangular i.e. y vs x but in the graph below, I have plotted the variable r against x in polar coordinates to produce a 'cardioid'.

At x = 0 degrees r=1, and at x=90 degrees, r=0, at x=270 degrees, r = -2.

This shapes follows from the sine wave and its symmetry around it peak at pi/2.

View attachment 168987
And looks like an ass...marvelous!
 
Twelve golf balls each numbered 1-12.
At point of commencement, any one of the balls can be either lighter or heavier than the other eleven.

Using a set of balance scales, in three moves, determine the number of the ball and its difference to the others
 
Twelve golf balls each numbered 1-12.
At point of commencement, any one of the balls can be either lighter or heavier than the other eleven.

Using a set of balance scales, in three moves, determine the number of the ball and its difference to the others
Couldn't work it out in 5 minutes so I googled the solution.
 
I came across a nice problem that using implicit differentation. The source for it is

A rocket blasts off vertically from a flat surface. You are 3000m from the rocket at launch and you have a ground-based camera. At a height of 4000m, you need to know what is the rate of change of inclination of your camera to keep it in your field of view. The rocket is assumed to be travelling vertically and has a velocity of 600 m/s at 4000m.

We can define a triangle as below and make the relation: 1762442366677.png

Using implicit differentiation, we can differentiate both sides with respect to time, t…

1762442340854.png

1762442340939.png


secϴ= 1/cos = 5/3, and dh/dt = 600 m/s.

Rearranging, we get 1762442340861.png or 4.13⁰/ s
 
I came across a nice problem that using implicit differentation. The source for it is

A rocket blasts off vertically from a flat surface. You are 3000m from the rocket at launch and you have a ground-based camera. At a height of 4000m, you need to know what is the rate of change of inclination of your camera to keep it in your field of view. The rocket is assumed to be travelling vertically and has a velocity of 600 m/s at 4000m.

We can define a triangle as below and make the relation: View attachment 174085

Using implicit differentiation, we can differentiate both sides with respect to time, t…

View attachment 174082

View attachment 174084


secϴ= 1/cos = 5/3, and dh/dt = 600 m/s.

Rearranging, we get View attachment 174083 or 4.13⁰/ s

I worked it out to 0.074 rad/ sec. :)
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top