The New York Times says - Journo's please take note?

F F

fbloke

Well-Known Member
Joined
26 Apr 2009
Messages
13,303
LONDON — Shortly before the kickoff at Manchester City’s stadium on a wet night, the 47,000 people in the audience were invited to put their hands together for a stranger. The cameras focused on a man in a gray business suit.


The Times's soccer blog has the world's game covered from all angles.
Go to the Goal Blog
“He’s here for his first ever game,” said the announcer. “Your owner, Sheik Mansour!” And the people did applaud this trim, smiling, youthful-looking 39-year-old who is a member of Abu Dhabi’s royal family, the son of its former ruler and half-brother of its current emir.

They were still applauding after the final whistle on Monday night. City beat Liverpool, 3-0, in the English Premier League, and you might say the United Arab Emirates beat the United States of America in terms of ownership of England’s sporting heritage.

Liverpool is, or was, a British institution, but its season is already in disarray. Had its major shareholders, the Americans Tom Hicks and George Gillett, flown in, they might have faced something closer to a lynching rather than polite applause. They are attempting to auction off Liverpool.

The sheik bought City lock, stock and oil barrels exactly two years ago. This is the first time he has jetted in to see how his $1 billion investment is shaping up. The Americans never had that kind of cash; they borrowed the money to make the purchase and loaded the interest charges from the bank loans onto the club.

Now, they wait to see who, if anyone, meets their price. Kenny Huang, the sports entrepreneur of mysterious Chinese connections, used media sources to make his bid and the same sources to withdraw it late last week. Either or both of Huang’s actions might be posturing; he might be playing for time until the price is right.

Or a Syrian might buy. Or the banks might call in the debt, forcing a fire sale of the two great playing assets Liverpool has, Steven Gerrard and Fernando Torres.

While Liverpool disintegrates, Manchester City accumulates.

Sheik Mansour bin Zayed al-Nahyan has the family wealth to toy with everyone else in the world game. His apparent joy in the stadium Monday was in seeing a third of the players recruited on his behalf.

Led by the effervescent, impish Argentine, Carlos Tévez, the team was good value for the three points. A three-goal margin exaggerated the difference, but without a doubt, City’s path is upward, while Liverpool’s, alas, is downward.

The first goal involved something rare in England’s top league. Adam Johnson set the ball rolling with a sharp, incisive move and pass down the right side. James Milner read the situation, darted between defenders, and picked out a colleague in pale blue. Gareth Barry side-footed the goal.

A goal worked by three Englishmen is uncommon in the Premiership. Johnson is a lean athlete, a throwback to the English wingers who would hug the touchline before taking on opponents and creating scoring chances.

The other two goals were claimed by Tévez, a poacher preying on Liverpool’s indecisiveness. It was Tévez to whom the sheik spoke after the match.

There were times when the owner wore an air of quiet bemusement.

And there were moments when, like an excited child, he caught the arm of Khaldoon al-Mubarak, the man he has appointed as his emissary to run the club.

Mubarak was able to show the boss roughly one-third of the playing riches amassed for him over the past two seasons at a cost of some $530 million.

Another third of the investments — seven players whose combined transfer market value is $140 million — sat on the bench, waiting to be summoned.

The final third — including the Italian Mario Balotelli, the Serb Aleksandar Kolarov, the German Jérôme Boateng, the Englishman Wayne Bridge, the Brazilian Robinho and the Welshman Craig Bellamy — were absent.

Four of them are under treatment for injuries. But Robinho doesn’t like Manchester’s weather and is on loan back to his boyhood club, Santos. Bellamy spoke too much about his disaffection with life on the bench and has also been dispatched to his hometown team, Cardiff, with Manchester City paying the bulk of his salary.

Money can soothe most things for Abu Dhabi City. Last season, the team’s No.1 goalie was Shay Given. Now he sits in reserve to the younger Joe Hart, and City’s coach, Roberto Mancini, says he will understand if Given decides to leave.

The caveat is that City will sell Given only to a club that is not competing to finish at least in the top four of the league. His choice is to step down to a lesser level or to accept City’s offer to stay with a raise above his current $120,000 a week salary.

Liverpool, by contrast, is in limbo. It has a new team manager, Roy Hodgson, but Hodgson’s choice is limited. How can he persuade new stars to join a club living on reputation while the club is up for auction and its investment portfolio bare?

Liverpool’s squad traveled Monday without the Argentine national captain, Javier Mascherano. He is a key player for Liverpool, but it seems his wife has no intention of settling in England. Her man has the opportunity to join Barcelona, and he was promised by previous management last year that he would be allowed to leave this August.

Time is running out. Barcelona is trying to play cute and to get him on the cheap, and to offer in part exchange Aleksandr Hleb. Liverpool wants straight cash because Hodgson wants to buy players he needs rather than one Barcelona wants to offload.

On Monday, Mascherano either withheld his labor or was told to stay away until the deal is done.

“I don’t know where Javier is,” Hodgson said. “But he’s not with us here, anyway. I’d like the chance to pick him again, because he’s a good player. But tonight would not have been a good time to select him because at the moment his mind isn’t right. His head has been turned by another club, but until the offer matches our valuation, he stays with us.”
Click to expand...
 
Re: The New York Times says

annoying that an american newspaper can be so accurate and devoid of spin,whilst our own are just the opposite. excellent journalism
 
Re: The New York Times says

bellbuzzer said:
annoying that an american newspaper can be so accurate and devoid of spin,whilst our own are just the opposite. excellent journalism
Click to expand...


Its easy to be impartial when you dont have a dog in the fight.

:-) They arent worried about over taking their old guard top 4.
 
Re: The New York Times says

That is objective journalism. With no agenda, no bias and certainly none of the malice displayed by the 'Great British Media' towards us of late. Our tabliods, and I include the broadsheets ought to be ashamed when they read an article worthy of the readership and not simply used as a vehicle to propel the one sided, southern based propoganda machine that is fleet street.
 
Re: The New York Times says

bellbuzzer said:
annoying that an american newspaper can be so accurate and devoid of spin,whilst our own are just the opposite. excellent journalism
Click to expand...

I wish you could see the faces of American fans when we read what passes for sports journalism in the UK. Our journos may miss some of the nuances of the game still, but at least our sports media are professionals with a modicum of ethics. I can safely I've never read "it is understood" on a sports page in the States.
 
Re: The New York Times says

blue_soundwave said:
Well, not that accurate, they think Robinho is still at Santos.
Click to expand...

Yeah but thats just a genuine mistake, as opposed to the opiniated, biased, bile masquarading as journalism that we have to put up with from the bitter British press.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.