The New York Times says - Journo's please take note?

[Garry.Cook]

I love how a city-loving article is 'unbiased' and 'truthful' but anything that has a dig is a load of bollocks. Some of you lot must have the blue-tinted specs welded on.

 

[Damocles]

I love how a city-loving article is 'unbiased' and 'truthful' but anything that has a dig is a load of bollocks. Some of you lot must have the blue-tinted specs welded on.

You seem in a bad mood today mate. Spurs are on soon, hopefully they'll get a few injuries or something.

 

[Garry.Cook]

I love how a city-loving article is 'unbiased' and 'truthful' but anything that has a dig is a load of bollocks. Some of you lot must have the blue-tinted specs welded on.

You seem in a bad mood today mate. Spurs are on soon, hopefully they'll get a few injuries or something.

Let's hope so. I'll put my dummy back in shall I?

 

[zeusbheld]

To be honest after reading the English Papers I find them to be incredibly impartial compared to most american papers..

if you compare politics, yeh but the amount of absolute shit and opinions no one cares about in the English sports pages is similar to watching the talkshows on Fox--typically, made up to serve an agenda. i get the impression that sports reporters in England don't consider it 'real' journalism and rather consider it entertainment only, and stir the pot rather than report facts (not too dissimilar to reporting on politics in most American news outlets). if you lopped off the sports pages and considered them separately, for straight up news, i prefer English papers to US papers. for sports the other way around.

 

[Blue Haze]

I love how a city-loving article is 'unbiased' and 'truthful' but anything that has a dig is a load of bollocks. Some of you lot must have the blue-tinted specs welded on.

More of a person's honest opinion.

I really doubt the NYT's sports writer has a bias here, just calling what he sees.