Johnsonontheleft
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 2,848
Damocles said:Johnsonontheleft said:Damocles said:A better analogy would be the ant already has a nuclear bomb, and are you any more likely to step on it if it has an older nuclear bomb rather than a shiny new one.
20 billion quid more likely?
If there really is no difference between the old and the new one other than the new one being shiny then I agree, that would be a waste of money.
Theres little difference in deterrent. A nuke is a nuke is a nuke
There must be a good reason for upgrading though - MPs voted for renewal something like 400-60. Isn't it to do with the new ones taking time to produce and the old ones becoming inactive - you don't want to be left with a period where the UK has no nuclear deterrent. That's my understanding of the argument for renewal but this may be wrong...?