I posted that climate change study can be imprecise. I am not sure how much more explicit I can be.I made no comment whatever on the truth or otherwise of climate change, I made no comment on what I think about it. I raised the point that these ten year warnings happen constantly and have done for years. How about addressing that point rather than an entirely different one?
I posted that climate change study can be imprecise. I am not sure how much more explicit I can be.
You are right that you made no comment whatsoever on what you think about. I invite you to share your thoughts on this topic given that you are keen to post on this thread.
I think we'll leave it as this conversation appears to be going around in one of those communist/fascist loops I have heard so much about recently.No. You are continuing to avoid the point raised. Saying it is "imprecise" does not address what I posted in the slightest. You don't get to define the terms of a conversation in your reply.
I think we'll leave it as this conversation appears to be going around in one of those communist/fascist loops I have heard so much about recently.
Thank you for your input and enjoy the weekend.
Without for a second endorsing the site (because I have no idea what it is) there have been an awful lot of times where we've been warned we have 10 years or so before disaster:
http://www.climatedepot.com/2018/10...recedented-changes-in-all-aspects-of-society/
No wonder people start ignoring such things, it's the boy shouting wolf all the time.
I support a lot of their policies, however they aren't very trade union friendly
MG100 The Green Party wants to see a world without borders.
Policy is they will only support collective strike action if it's an environmental issue.How come?