Bilboblue
Well-Known Member
The cookie monster said:Bilboblue said:The cookie monster said:Terry was behind it mate
Its in makelele's book,and it was known back then that the mad russian stuck by the players and fucked jose off..
I'd like you to link that, as I got other information about it.
I stand to be corrected though.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.foxsportsasia.com/football/premier-league/news/detail/item276401/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.foxsportsasia.com/football/p ... tem276401/</a>
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/may/30/chelsea-john-terry-jose-mourinho" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009 ... e-mourinho</a>
Thanks cookie, it's still very vague though, as this paragraph shows:
.Terry has consistently stated that he played no intentional role in the departure of Mourinho and has denied that he was disloyal to him. Indeed, the pair have remained in regular contact since Mourinho moved to Internazionale last summer. Yet relations between the club's most successful manager and Abramovich had deteriorated from the middle of the 2006-07 season when they clashed over transfer policy and the hiring of Avram Grant, who would eventually leave his role as director of football to succeed Mourinho
Why would Mourinho stay in contact if Terry was the cause of his departure, and why would Abramovich want him back with Terry still playing?