The Squad planning thread

It all kinda depends on if we stick to wide fullbacks (double wide like now or maybe just 1 or none next season).

1) Wide fullbacks 4222/442 (diamond)
Anderson alone isn't enough, I count only a strong core of 20, but we are light at fullback.

View attachment 183224

While Nico O can be considered the backup at LB, its kinda fake depth because then we lost a midfielder depth, and if we only bring in Anderson for the departures of Bernie and Kova you can see the problem.

This is easily solved by buying another LB and RB (Nunes backup), or ideally 1 fullback who can cover both positions would be ideal to keep a strong core of 21.

The downsides I see here are trying to convince the CBs to accept sitting on the bench, because when fit, usually Pep doesn't like to rotate the backline as much as he does anywhere else.

2) 442 to 3412 (in possession)

One potential solution is to go to a back 3 in possession (still back 4 out of possession) by tilting 1 fullback wide and 1 winger wide, which in a coincidence also requires no more new fullbacks, but can use our younger CB depth like Reis and Alleyne who are likely more accepting of backup roles than Guehi/Gvardiol.

View attachment 183225

I wonder which of these 2 systems we use next season, very clearly we are using 1), but Im not entirely sure we will next season.
Think the forwards, midfielders and full backs we have in the squ ad are more suited to 1 and think myself we'll go with that. Except for the 2 '10s' we'd have Reijnders, Foden, Cherki, Lewis maybe even Doku.
 
Think the forwards, midfielders and full backs we have in the squ ad are more suited to 1 and think myself we'll go with that. Except for the 2 '10s' we'd have Reijnders, Foden, Cherki, Lewis maybe even Doku.
Yeah thats the downside to shifting to a back 3 or 3412, 2 10s and 2 strikers can't work.

That's why I threw Reijnders as a Marmoush backup, and it also has Doku back to a wide role rather than a rotation for Marmoush.

So it has downside for some of those offensive players, but maybe the upside of the back 3 balances it out.

Speaking of Lewis, as long as he is okay as a backup to the players listed I like having him, but I wonder if he will be okay with that role.
 
Yeah thats the downside to shifting to a back 3 or 3412, 2 10s and 2 strikers can't work.

That's why I threw Reijnders as a Marmoush backup, and it also has Doku back to a wide role rather than a rotation for Marmoush.

So it has downside for some of those offensive players, but maybe the upside of the back 3 balances it out.

Speaking of Lewis, as long as he is okay as a backup to the players listed I like having him, but I wonder if he will be okay with that role.
See it more 4222 myself, but while it suits Reijnders ,Cherki Foden and Marmoush Semenyo as a front 2 maybe doesn't get the best from Haaland.
 
It all kinda depends on if we stick to wide fullbacks (double wide like now or maybe just 1 or none next season).

1) Wide fullbacks 4222/442 (diamond)
Anderson alone isn't enough, I count only a strong core of 20, but we are light at fullback.

View attachment 183224

While Nico O can be considered the backup at LB, its kinda fake depth because then we lost a midfielder depth, and if we only bring in Anderson for the departures of Bernie and Kova you can see the problem.

This is easily solved by buying another LB and RB (Nunes backup), or ideally 1 fullback who can cover both positions would be ideal to keep a strong core of 21.

The downsides I see here are trying to convince the CBs to accept sitting on the bench, because when fit, usually Pep doesn't like to rotate the backline as much as he does anywhere else.

2) 442 to 3412 (in possession)

One potential solution is to go to a back 3 in possession (still back 4 out of possession) by tilting 1 fullback wide and 1 winger wide, which in a coincidence also requires no more new fullbacks, but can use our younger CB depth like Reis and Alleyne who are likely more accepting of backup roles than Guehi/Gvardiol.

View attachment 183225

I wonder which of these 2 systems we use next season, very clearly we are using 1), but Im not entirely sure we will next season.
I think if Guehi, Khusa, and Ruben are fit we can easily consider Josko and NOR rotation (or first XI) options at LB. Josk is one of our best players so getting him on the pitch is paramount IMO. I think he could play anywhere in almost any system. And the same looks to be true about NOR. What gold we've struck with that lad...
 
Being disingenuous leaving out the Madrid games where Walker pocketed Vinicius and was trusted to play against one of the best players in the world at the time.

Nunes’ lawyers in this forum are unable to swallow the pill that he is Delph 2.0. Gets the job done but clearly not at the level we require. He is playing games because his sole competitor is Rico Lewis.

Last season when KDB was injured, Foden was awful.. who did Pep turn to for creating chances??

Matteus NUNES. And his 14 G+A saved our season.

And this season.. he's tied for 2nd best after Cherki with Haaland and Doku.

1770739878657.png

Pep always goes with offensive minded full backs.. from Delph to Zinchenko to Cancelo to Nunes to Ait Nouri.

Good luck finding one that can create more than Nunes..

Try twisting that reality in with your facts.
 
Nunes has become a very good right back, most City fans have now accepted that, just one or two stragglers still to realise, sure you’ll realise one day. We need somebody to rotate with him but doubt whoever we bring in will be coming as a replacement
He has hugely improved - there is no argument there....but I thnk we need a starting fullback with Nunes as back up...at the least
 
I’m sure years ago Pep converting Silva from a RW to an eight must have ticked you off? There’s nothing wrong with Nunes and there’s no upgrades out there either, he’s excelling as a RB, it’s his position now.
Ridiculous post...

No it didnt.....

Nothing about football in any way ticks me off.

Its his position I agree..he aint good enough to play as a midfielder for us long term which is part of the reason he is now at fullback
 
Ridiculous post...

No it didnt.....

Nothing about football in any way ticks me off.

Its his position I agree..he aint good enough to play as a midfielder for us long term which is part of the reason he is now at fullback
It’s great we agree that Nunes as a midfielder isn’t good enough but at fullback is more than adequate.
 
2026-2027 SQUAD...

1000024051.jpg
Backed up with academy players eg Reigan Heskey, Ryan McAidoo, Gray, Branthwaite etc...

RB: Personally would prefer Livramento but he seems to be staying at Newcastle, not sure about those TAA rumours either plus he would be very very expensive...

TRANSFERS OUT
1 Stones
2 Ake
3 Kova
4 Bernie :-(
5 Philips
6 Grealish
7 Lewis
8 Savinho
 
Last edited:
2026-2027 SQUAD...

View attachment 183333
Backed up with academy players eg Reigan Heskey, Ryan McAidoo, Gray, Branthwaite etc...

TRANSFERS OUT
1 Stones
2 Ake
3 Kova
4 Bernie :-(
5 Philips
6 Grealish
7 Lewis
8 Savinho
i think Mfuni and Mukasa will go on another loan, need to see what will be situation with Josko next season for Reis to stay
 
Like it or not, Trafford is too good to be a number two and even Jack Gaughan has posted that Trafford wants to leave to be a number one at a top club? Also, David Ornstein posted that Tonali was offered around on deadline day in the premier by his agents so not seemingly that much in a rush to leave england?
not knocking your view but, Trafford just signed a long contract, our last goalie who left for first team game time, so he could get his international spot, disappeared, if Trafford wins the league cup or FA cup he will be one of a very few English goalies to have done so. Tonali has been touted about, but that was only to stir up interest, ultimately he will chose where he wants to play, or Newcastle will continue to pay his wages.
 
Still think Archie Gray would be a good addition. Unconvinced that we need an orthodox right-back (ala Kayode) and Gray is young (younger than O'Reilly), tall (taller than Nunes), and positionally versatile, which would give us greater utility. He'll soon be on his third manager at Spurs, so if he wants a bit of stability and to come back up north, might be a good time to test the waters this summer.
 
Still think Archie Gray would be a good addition. Unconvinced that we need an orthodox right-back (ala Kayode) and Gray is young (younger than O'Reilly), tall (taller than Nunes), and positionally versatile, which would give us greater utility. He'll soon be on his third manager at Spurs, so if he wants a bit of stability and to come back up north, might be a good time to test the waters this summer.

Think we are fixed on Kayode or Read mate.
 
Dadason scored one goal and is the new Lewandowski?

Where is Marmoush in this plan as supporting Haaland.

Why do we need to loan Solet when you can sign Guehi.
Dadason as according to Spanish media.
Marmoush is the same as Semenyo, he is not a striker, he can not play like Haaland, so we have to adjust.
Guehi can play left or right but he is small and not fast, Solet is big and quick, but he would be the temporary replacement for Akanji and Stones, not Gvardiol, Ake, Dias or Khushanov
 
Obviously it did not happen, but we would loan to see if he can adapt to the PL, at this moment he is a better footballer than Akanji, but has a bit of a chequered past.
so in other words we wouldn’t want him and don’t need him. Also why would the loan rather than sell
 
Like we were fixed on Cambiaso, Frimpong, and Livramento etc.. Nobody on here has a clue whom we’ll sign, so all we can do is speculate as to the best option.

Txiki had the numerous options, ask @Gumzy97 who knows more about Viana than me but once he fixes on his A & B choices he always gets one of them.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top