The Stones Goal

Was it right to give a goal?


  • Total voters
    866

MCFC1993

Moderator
Joined
5 Dec 2008
Messages
35,460
Separate from any analysis of the match and to get ahead of any 'it wasn't a goal' nonsense.

I've got to add a thread after the Micah Richards and Daniel Sturridge nonsense. It's a goal isn't it?

What Bernardo does before Stones heads the ball is irrelevant because he's onside when the corner is taken.

When Stones heads it he's completely ducked out of the way, nowhere near interfering with Sa. Obvious goal.

Regarding the officials, the linesman is right to stick his flag up from his angle, I think the referee should have overruled him on field, people are saying he did? But I'm not sure he actually did. Shouldn't need the monitor but well done to him and VAR for getting the right decision.

I'll add a poll but surely it's unanimous?
 
I didn’t realize the infield decision was no goal. I thought at the time they’d sent him over to the monitor to disallow it.

So did I, partly because I was going mental, I had Aguero v Spurs in the Champions League flashbacks.

Hadn't realised the linesman had stuck his flag up.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.