You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The stupidest rule in football??
- Thread starter aarond
- Start date
Hollywood Blue
Well-Known Member
I think the rule where players from Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal and the rags get away with things that players from other teams get punished for is the worst.
Hollywood Blue said:I think the rule where players from Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal and the rags get away with things that players from other teams get punished for is the worst.
That also includes the FA punishing SWP after he was assulted twice, but allows Bosingshit to kick someone in the back, and Gerard to kamikazi another player???
Nixon_The_Bike_Thief
Well-Known Member
for me its booking players for over exubarance after scoring ! whats that all about ?
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
aarond said:I think the stupid rule where a player gets injured and has to go off the pitch, but he may be the freekick taker or your best defender!
What is the point of this rule???
It's to stop players just going down feigning injury and wasting more time by bringing the physio on.
cmonfeedthegoat
Active Member
- Joined
- 14 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 30
To answer the original Question, yes, its bl00dy annoying. but i think its to try an combat players making more of their injuries in order to waste time. For example, if a player of the winning team gets fouled, players tend to make a meal of this in order to waste time. however, if it means them having to go off the pitch for 20/30 secs or so they may not do this.
Wouldnt say it works myself but think thats why
Wouldnt say it works myself but think thats why
aarond said:Hollywood Blue said:I think the rule where players from Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal and the rags get away with things that players from other teams get punished for is the worst.
That also includes the FA punishing SWP after he was assulted twice, but allows Bosingshit to kick someone in the back, and Gerard to kamikazi another player???
Ronaldo at least twice this season has kicked out in retaliation, why SWP?
M
M
mat
Guest
for me it's the "superstar" rule.
If your name is Gerrard,Terry, Ferdinand,Vidic,Ronaldo,Rooney,Lampard,Cashley Cole,Joe Cole.Fat Fwank,Alonso,Torres you can get away with murder.
If your name is Gerrard,Terry, Ferdinand,Vidic,Ronaldo,Rooney,Lampard,Cashley Cole,Joe Cole.Fat Fwank,Alonso,Torres you can get away with murder.
Chippy_boy
Well-Known Member
cmonfeedthegoat said:To answer the original Question, yes, its bl00dy annoying. but i think its to try an combat players making more of their injuries in order to waste time. For example, if a player of the winning team gets fouled, players tend to make a meal of this in order to waste time. however, if it means them having to go off the pitch for 20/30 secs or so they may not do this.
Wouldnt say it works myself but think thats why
Agreed. I'd rather for injuries outside the box at least, they just carried on. Let the injured player have as much of a roll around as he likes and bring the physios on if they want whilst play continues. Then we'd see how much play acting went on.
amone said:aarond said:Hollywood Blue said:I think the rule where players from Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal and the rags get away with things that players from other teams get punished for is the worst.
That also includes the FA punishing SWP after he was assulted twice, but allows Bosingshit to kick someone in the back, and Gerard to kamikazi another player???
Ronaldo at least twice this season has kicked out in retaliation, why SWP?
Can City take examples like this to the FA to support SWP?? Probably not. Pisses me off that he'll get 3 matches. The ref saw it and didn't do anything about it as that fat moron kicked him, then kicked the ball at him - both red card offences.