The Sun "newspaper"

[moomba]

Re: The Sun "newspaper"

I have no idea what you just wrote then.

But if you can't bring yourself to concede that good press is better for the commercial attractiveness of a business than constant bad press then theres not much point discussing.

 

[Dave S]

If anyone with an IQ of over ten years of age reads the Sun I'll be stunned.

 

[Pigeonho]

Re: The Sun

I have no idea what you just wrote then.

But if you can't bring yourself to concede that good press is better for the commercial attractiveness of a business than constant bad press then theres not much point discussing.

I've showed you examples of how the agenda isn't working, and that's all I can go off. As I say, when someone openly says they didn't put their companies name on one of the most talked about football clubs in the world, and give the sun as their reason, I'll look at it again.

 

[moomba]

Re: The Sun "newspaper"

I have no idea what you just wrote then.

But if you can't bring yourself to concede that good press is better for the commercial attractiveness of a business than constant bad press then theres not much point discussing.

I've showed you examples of how the agenda isn't working, and that's all I can go off. As I say, when someone openly says they didn't put their companies name on one of the most talked about football clubs in the world, and give the sun as their reason, I'll look at it again.

Like I said, if you can't bring yourself to concede that very obvious statement theres no point in discussing.

 

[Chippy_boy]

Re: The Sun

I have no idea what you just wrote then.

But if you can't bring yourself to concede that good press is better for the commercial attractiveness of a business than constant bad press then theres not much point discussing.

I've showed you examples of how the agenda isn't working, and that's all I can go off. As I say, when someone openly says they didn't put their companies name on one of the most talked about football clubs in the world, and give the sun as their reason, I'll look at it again.

Like I said, if you can't bring yourself to concede that very obvious statement theres no point in discussing.

Agreed.

"I have smoked 60 cigs a day since I was 14 and I feel great. Therefore smoking can't be bad for you."

 

[dawlish dave]

Not doing a very good job of it, I must say.

I thought there was no agenda?

Where would we be without you keeping us on the straight and narrow? You've taken on a tough gig policing / trolling the entire forum, and sitting above the common herd, gavel in hand. Your arm must be fair worn out with all the "next casing" you do. It's a vocation I suppose, something you've been called to for the common good? There are those who think you don't believe half of what you write, but you do believe in your own superiority and discernment and the necessity of reminding everyone several times a day just how gullible, how unreasonable, how plain fucking stupid they are. You might not violate the letter of the CoC but you sure as hell wipe your arse on the spirit.

The spirit? Of what? The spirit of bluemoon? Fucking lol.

He is on 15 plus post a day how do plonkers like this find the time,

 

[Pigeonho]

I thought there was no agenda?

Where would we be without you keeping us on the straight and narrow? You've taken on a tough gig policing / trolling the entire forum, and sitting above the common herd, gavel in hand. Your arm must be fair worn out with all the "next casing" you do. It's a vocation I suppose, something you've been called to for the common good? There are those who think you don't believe half of what you write, but you do believe in your own superiority and discernment and the necessity of reminding everyone several times a day just how gullible, how unreasonable, how plain fucking stupid they are. You might not violate the letter of the CoC but you sure as hell wipe your arse on the spirit.

The spirit? Of what? The spirit of bluemoon? Fucking lol.

He is on 15 plus post a day how do plonkers like this find the time,

No need to get personal.

 

[dawlish dave]

The spirit? Of what? The spirit of bluemoon? Fucking lol.

He is on 15 plus post a day how do plonkers like this find the time,

No need to get personal.

Sorry if I offended you, but methinks its a case of the pot calling the kettle black coming from a Bluemoon keyboard warrior like yourself.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Mirror/Sun/Mail/Express/Metro - each and every one of them shite. The Mail especially so as it masquerades as being somehow "high-brow" when, in fact, it's nothing but ill-informed, statistically inept, plagiarised from Nigel Farage's diary, ultra right-wing bollocks.

So which papers do you read? The ones mentioned must be read avidly, to formulate an opinion on their contents with such malevolence. So which are the dead good papers we all should read to ensure our thought processes are not polluted with reactionary filth?

Why would I need to have read them "avidly"? A mere flick through any one of them, on any given day, would be enough to inform even the simplest of minds. You seem to have conflated an understanding of something with a deep experience of something. My "malevolence" comes from watching a nation of idiots reading and believing the nonsense they're peddled by 99% of the press. A nation of people unable to inform themselves - "The Sun says we should vote for Maggie so, yep, that's what we'll do." A nation that tunes in, "avidly" to "I'm a fucking celebrity", "wanking in ice", etc, etc, whilst all around them kids starve; MPs rifle the public purse and banks take the unadulterated piss out of each and every one of us. But hey, Bruce Forsyth's received his knighthood, the Queen's in fine fettle, so all is well.

Best place for news...Radio 4, BBC News. And, to balance out such "liberal tosh", a bit of Peter Hitchins / Melanie Phillips on Question Time - nowt like a good laugh on a Thursday night.

You like the word 'conflated'. You seem to use it with great frequency.

 

[Sigh]

Not doing a very good job of it, I must say.

I thought there was no agenda?

Where would we be without you keeping us on the straight and narrow? You've taken on a tough gig policing / trolling the entire forum, and sitting above the common herd, gavel in hand. Your arm must be fair worn out with all the "next casing" you do. It's a vocation I suppose, something you've been called to for the common good? There are those who think you don't believe half of what you write, but you do believe in your own superiority and discernment and the necessity of reminding everyone several times a day just how gullible, how unreasonable, how plain fucking stupid they are. You might not violate the letter of the CoC but you sure as hell wipe your arse on the spirit.

The spirit? Of what? The spirit of bluemoon? Fucking lol.

The CoC. It was plainly stated, "[the] letter of the CoC...[on] the spirit."