momo88 said:ok the papers are a bit twat but some city fans and football fans in general are a bit paranoid with everything ! city was shit tonight if Pellegrini felt that he couldn't do a shit against Barca he could came up early and said CL is not the objectif so why all the talking before the match about attacking pressing and that barca are afraid of coming ... to come up playing that way boring and they still scored !
Ancient Citizen said:So which papers do you read? The ones mentioned must be read avidly, to formulate an opinion on their contents with such malevolence. So which are the dead good papers we all should read to ensure our thought processes are not polluted with reactionary filth?johnnytapia said:Ancient Citizen said:All very true. Other winners are those who have never bought that left-wing, bile-filled, infantile, made for the masses horseshit that is the Mirror.
Have a butchers at their back page.
Mirror/Sun/Mail/Express/Metro - each and every one of them shite. The Mail especially so as it masquerades as being somehow "high-brow" when, in fact, it's nothing but ill-informed, statistically inept, plagiarised from Nigel Farage's diary, ultra right-wing bollocks.
Hah you think the same way as me, I like you.johnnytapia said:Ancient Citizen said:So which papers do you read? The ones mentioned must be read avidly, to formulate an opinion on their contents with such malevolence. So which are the dead good papers we all should read to ensure our thought processes are not polluted with reactionary filth?johnnytapia said:Mirror/Sun/Mail/Express/Metro - each and every one of them shite. The Mail especially so as it masquerades as being somehow "high-brow" when, in fact, it's nothing but ill-informed, statistically inept, plagiarised from Nigel Farage's diary, ultra right-wing bollocks.
Why would I need to have read them "avidly"? A mere flick through any one of them, on any given day, would be enough to inform even the simplest of minds. You seem to have conflated an understanding of something with a deep experience of something. My "malevolence" comes from watching a nation of idiots reading and believing the nonsense they're peddled by 99% of the press. A nation of people unable to inform themselves - "The Sun says we should vote for Maggie so, yep, that's what we'll do." A nation that tunes in, "avidly" to "I'm a fucking celebrity", "wanking in ice", etc, etc, whilst all around them kids starve; MPs rifle the public purse and banks take the unadulterated piss out of each and every one of us. But hey, Bruce Forsyth's received his knighthood, the Queen's in fine fettle, so all is well.
Best place for news...Radio 4, BBC News. And, to balance out such "liberal tosh", a bit of Peter Hitchins / Melanie Phillips on Question Time - nowt like a good laugh on a Thursday night.
dom said:momo88 said:ok the papers are a bit twat but some city fans and football fans in general are a bit paranoid with everything ! city was shit tonight if Pellegrini felt that he couldn't do a shit against Barca he could came up early and said CL is not the objectif so why all the talking before the match about attacking pressing and that barca are afraid of coming ... to come up playing that way boring and they still scored !
Google Translate ??
Why Always Ste said:I'm losing any respect I had for City's media team the more I read headlines like this and witnessing the blatant media bias against the club I support.
They don't seem to defend the club, nor have I seen any implications against these twats who write absolute gutter headlines against this football club.
if I had my way all these twats would be banned from City, giving exclusives to journo's who are willing to atleast show some balanced views rather than this shit.
I don't want to see every newspaper/radio/tv station all groveling about City. I do however want to see a balanced view, both outlining the negative and positive, not just this constant unbalanced negative shit.
Not doing a very good job of it, I must say.Shirley said:Why Always Ste said:I'm losing any respect I had for City's media team the more I read headlines like this and witnessing the blatant media bias against the club I support.
They don't seem to defend the club, nor have I seen any implications against these twats who write absolute gutter headlines against this football club.
if I had my way all these twats would be banned from City, giving exclusives to journo's who are willing to atleast show some balanced views rather than this shit.
I don't want to see every newspaper/radio/tv station all groveling about City. I do however want to see a balanced view, both outlining the negative and positive, not just this constant unbalanced negative shit.
I've said it from day one of the takeover, you can call it bias or an agenda or what ever, it is coming from fergie and his rag troops. They know exactly what they are doing, damaging the brand City and the owners are trying to create.
Pigeonho said:Not doing a very good job of it, I must say.Shirley said:Why Always Ste said:I'm losing any respect I had for City's media team the more I read headlines like this and witnessing the blatant media bias against the club I support.
They don't seem to defend the club, nor have I seen any implications against these twats who write absolute gutter headlines against this football club.
if I had my way all these twats would be banned from City, giving exclusives to journo's who are willing to atleast show some balanced views rather than this shit.
I don't want to see every newspaper/radio/tv station all groveling about City. I do however want to see a balanced view, both outlining the negative and positive, not just this constant unbalanced negative shit.
I've said it from day one of the takeover, you can call it bias or an agenda or what ever, it is coming from fergie and his rag troops. They know exactly what they are doing, damaging the brand City and the owners are trying to create.
Pigeonho said:Not doing a very good job of it, I must say.Shirley said:Why Always Ste said:I'm losing any respect I had for City's media team the more I read headlines like this and witnessing the blatant media bias against the club I support.
They don't seem to defend the club, nor have I seen any implications against these twats who write absolute gutter headlines against this football club.
if I had my way all these twats would be banned from City, giving exclusives to journo's who are willing to atleast show some balanced views rather than this shit.
I don't want to see every newspaper/radio/tv station all groveling about City. I do however want to see a balanced view, both outlining the negative and positive, not just this constant unbalanced negative shit.
I've said it from day one of the takeover, you can call it bias or an agenda or what ever, it is coming from fergie and his rag troops. They know exactly what they are doing, damaging the brand City and the owners are trying to create.
The spirit? Of what? The spirit of bluemoon? Fucking lol.Sigh said:Pigeonho said:Not doing a very good job of it, I must say.Shirley said:I've said it from day one of the takeover, you can call it bias or an agenda or what ever, it is coming from fergie and his rag troops. They know exactly what they are doing, damaging the brand City and the owners are trying to create.
I thought there was no agenda?
Where would we be without you keeping us on the straight and narrow? You've taken on a tough gig policing / trolling the entire forum, and sitting above the common herd, gavel in hand. Your arm must be fair worn out with all the "next casing" you do. It's a vocation I suppose, something you've been called to for the common good? There are those who think you don't believe half of what you write, but you do believe in your own superiority and discernment and the necessity of reminding everyone several times a day just how gullible, how unreasonable, how plain fucking stupid they are. You might not violate the letter of the CoC but you sure as hell wipe your arse on the spirit.