just out of interest and honestly not as a dig, do you guys agree with what neville said in the telegraph the other day?
" And that is big issue facing City this summer -- United, Chelsea and Arsenal are now all capable of taking them on in the transfer market and, if a player has a straight choice between the four clubs, City will come fourth every time.
Why is that?
When choosing a new club, players will always want to win trophies, live in the best location and play for a club with history and tradition.
London is such a huge draw, especially for foreign players, so Arsenal and Chelsea have an advantage over United and City in that respect. But United’s history and tradition is their trump card, one which will attract players to Old Trafford ahead of the capital."
Do you think this, coupled with the restrictions of ffp (which i don't agree with at all) will make it hard to sign the player you want? Also, arsenal are also now very attractive prospects compared to a few years ago so thats another club you have to compete with
" And that is big issue facing City this summer -- United, Chelsea and Arsenal are now all capable of taking them on in the transfer market and, if a player has a straight choice between the four clubs, City will come fourth every time.
Why is that?
When choosing a new club, players will always want to win trophies, live in the best location and play for a club with history and tradition.
London is such a huge draw, especially for foreign players, so Arsenal and Chelsea have an advantage over United and City in that respect. But United’s history and tradition is their trump card, one which will attract players to Old Trafford ahead of the capital."
Do you think this, coupled with the restrictions of ffp (which i don't agree with at all) will make it hard to sign the player you want? Also, arsenal are also now very attractive prospects compared to a few years ago so thats another club you have to compete with