’Fraid not, gdm. You're confusing it with a relative clause, where you'd be correct on the rule (and even then, only in the case of non-defining relatives). You've elided the conjunction (as we do), but it doesn't change the rule.
For example: “Lovebites believes (that) gdm is mistaken in this instance.” ≠ “Lovebites believes, (that) gdm is mistaken in this instance.”
I have a sneaking suspicion that people are less than fascinated by the point, though. Perhaps if we wish to continue it we should revert to pm
;-)