The two faces of Terry...............

spursmad321

Well-Known Member
Joined
6 Jun 2009
Messages
365
This is from the top table they are very very annoyed with Terry decision to stay at Chelski, they were very confident that he would join, he has always given the impression he would join City and said so in many discussions. He even threatened to hand in a transfer request if he had to. This is why City didn't pull the plug on the deal because they always believed it would happen, unlike the Eto'o deal.

Regarding the Eto'o deal this was 100% agreed, but City had had enough of waiting for Eto'o and Barcelona to sort out they end, so City made an enquiry for Adebayor who was their 2nd target and the london scum gave them plenty of encoragement, so City gave up on the Eto'o deal.

The Lescott deal is very much sorted regarding the player, but Everton ( Moyles) are playing hard ball about the fee, having orginally agreeing a fee, they now keep moving the goal posts. ( fees/players) This deal will happen its just a case of when not if.

Onuoha will be going nowhere, Richards on the other hand I'm not so sure.

Cheers

Spursmad321
 
spursmad321 said:
This is from the top table they are very very annoyed with Terry decision to stay at Chelski, they were very confident that he would join, he has always given the impression he would join City and said so in many discussions. He even threatened to hand in a transfer request if he had to. This is why City didn't pull the plug on the deal because they always believed it would happen, unlike the Eto'o deal.

Regarding the Eto'o deal this was 100% agreed, but City had had enough of waiting for Eto'o and Barcelona to sort out they end, so City made an enquiry for Adebayor who was their 2nd target and the london scum gave them plenty of encoragement, so City gave up on the Eto'o deal.

The Lescott deal is very much sorted regarding the player, but Everton ( Moyles) are playing hard ball about the fee, having orginally agreeing a fee, they now keep moving the goal posts. ( fees/players) This deal will happen its just a case of when not if.

Onuoha will be going nowhere, Richards on the other hand I'm not so sure.

Cheers

Spursmad321

Thanks for keeping us updated pal
 
I will be fucking gutted if we lose Richards for the sake of getting in lescott, Richards has huge potential and to let him go would be a mistake. I really don't want to lose him
 
i know for a fact terry wanted to come here, he just shit himself when push came to shove.
no way will moyes keep an unhappy player, lescott will come.
eto as you say was a him v barca thing, fuck em.
think we should keep richards.ned is a no brainer.
 
Thanks SM.

One small piece of advice, work on your percentages. Will get you a lot let abuse on here.

100% to me means signed sealed delivered shirt in hand.

Try not to refer to deals as 100% when they clearly arent. Im not doubting you, just advising :)
 
We can't be giving Everton Much cash if we give them Richards, Utd and Chelsea bid 22m last summer although hes not worth that now and not had the best year, hes still got the potential. I don't think it would come down to that anyway.
 
spursmad321 said:
Onuoha will be going nowhere, Richards on the other hand I'm not so sure.

I wonder why Dunney is never mentioned as a makeweight. Much as I respect him for his service, being the elder statesman I would prefer to see him used as a makeweight rather than move on a versatile defender who has most of his career ahead of him. Sure Micah has been the weaker link of late but he has all his learning to do. Much as it pains me to say, Dunneys career is largely behind him.
 
spursmad321 said:
This is from the top table they are very very annoyed with Terry decision to stay at Chelski, they were very confident that he would join, he has always given the impression he would join City and said so in many discussions. He even threatened to hand in a transfer request if he had to. This is why City didn't pull the plug on the deal because they always believed it would happen, unlike the Eto'o deal.

Regarding the Eto'o deal this was 100% agreed, but City had had enough of waiting for Eto'o and Barcelona to sort out they end, so City made an enquiry for Adebayor who was their 2nd target and the london scum gave them plenty of encoragement, so City gave up on the Eto'o deal.

The Lescott deal is very much sorted regarding the player, but Everton ( Moyles) are playing hard ball about the fee, having orginally agreeing a fee, they now keep moving the goal posts. ( fees/players) This deal will happen its just a case of when not if.

Onuoha will be going nowhere, Richards on the other hand I'm not so sure.

Cheers

Spursmad321

Are you suggesting that Richards may be used a make weight in the deal or that he could be off in general?
 
rice10 said:
spursmad321 said:
This is from the top table they are very very annoyed with Terry decision to stay at Chelski, they were very confident that he would join, he has always given the impression he would join City and said so in many discussions. He even threatened to hand in a transfer request if he had to. This is why City didn't pull the plug on the deal because they always believed it would happen, unlike the Eto'o deal.

Regarding the Eto'o deal this was 100% agreed, but City had had enough of waiting for Eto'o and Barcelona to sort out they end, so City made an enquiry for Adebayor who was their 2nd target and the london scum gave them plenty of encoragement, so City gave up on the Eto'o deal.

The Lescott deal is very much sorted regarding the player, but Everton ( Moyles) are playing hard ball about the fee, having orginally agreeing a fee, they now keep moving the goal posts. ( fees/players) This deal will happen its just a case of when not if.

Onuoha will be going nowhere, Richards on the other hand I'm not so sure.

Cheers

Spursmad321

Are you suggesting that Richards may be used a make weight in the deal or that he could be off in general?
Could be loaned I guess.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top