AntiUnited
Well-Known Member
jay_mcfc said:AntiUnited said:The irony is it came from a stoke style of hoofing the ball up the pitch..
No it didn't
erm if thats not hoofing i dont know what is..
jay_mcfc said:AntiUnited said:The irony is it came from a stoke style of hoofing the ball up the pitch..
No it didn't
AntiUnited said:ok its more like a lob then a hoof still route one football when they have spent all that money on a attacking midfielder they still rather play it on the wing or pass on top. still shit football.
jay_mcfc said:AntiUnited said:ok its more like a lob then a hoof still route one football when they have spent all that money on a attacking midfielder they still rather play it on the wing or pass on top. still shit football.
Deluded
Being impartial is too much for some on here.sjk2008 said:jay_mcfc said:AntiUnited said:ok its more like a lob then a hoof still route one football when they have spent all that money on a attacking midfielder they still rather play it on the wing or pass on top. still shit football.
Deluded
He's not deluded, mate. He's just clueless when it comes to football.
Remember, this whopper only started following football 4yrs ago and, through his own admission, supports both Liverpool and Man City.
Anyone with a brain and the ability to be impartial for once in their life can clearly differentiate between what Rooney's assist was and what a Stoke-esque "hoof" is.
A superb ball and a fucking ridiculous finish, as you say.