Theo Walcott? ..

[greeny-ctid]

Would you have him here? I personally would I know people slag him off I really do believe he has hit a brick wall at arsenal. If he came here I think Mancini would take him under his wing and turn him into a better player than he already is and would thrive here.

 

[TCIB]

No chance.

We can't be nursing players atm, we are at a stage far removed from that. Right now we need "been there, done it types".
He is far to inconsistant and lacks a footballing brain.

 

[jimmygrumble]

No way, he has one skill, he's fast.

Forest gump?

Oxlade chamberlain would be a better investment IMHO.

 

[Heart.net]

not this shit again.

 

[Love_Each_Day]

not this shit again.

Haha I could understand multiple threads suggesting a particular player if he was really good, but Walcott??..

 

[youngkippax]

you must have been pissed when you posted this

 

[whothefisAlice]

No more Arsenal players f.f.s!

 

[carlos tevez is a blue]

No more Arsenal players f.f.s!

Robin Van Persie he scores when he wants...........

 

[whothefisAlice]

No more Arsenal players f.f.s!

Robin Van Persie he scores when he wants...........

Ok I will make an exception, however (as has been butchered at length in the other threads) he is getting on a bit, and surely would get injured the first kick of a ball in our shirt and miss the entire first season, followed by retirement and the worst signing we ever made. So come to think of it no...Cavani or Gomez please.

 

[dwaynemcfc123]

No way, he has one skill, he's fast.

Forest gump?

Oxlade chamberlain would be a better investment IMHO.

Agreed, oxlade chamberlains end product is twice what walcotts is