Theo Walcott? ..

[alky313]

Wenger from a man management point of view is a better manager than Mancini, there I said it.

 

[TCIB]

Wenger from a man management point of view is a better manager than Mancini, there I said it.

You dirty rat, you killed my bruder.

Possibly but where has it gotten him after the great team he inherited all retired or left.

 

[Shauntheprofitmachine]

 

[FantasyIreland]

Chelski making a bid apparently according to The Mirror.

Sturridge wouldn't want that.....

 

[southern muppet]

He's improved a lot IMO in the last year. Less of the headless chicken factor about him. Not worth us going for though.

 

[C_T_I_D]

This move wouldn't work basically.

Walcott is a very direct attacking right back but Maicon, who is close to signing for Chelsea, would need more protection as Bale exploited him when Spurs played Inter.

If he went unprotected defensively then he could cost Chelsea badly.

 

[ifiwasarichfan]

I would take him like a shot.

I think he is played out of position, he should play through the middle. Skill,finishing and pace and more pace on top of that.

 

[dctid]

Would you have him here? I personally would I know people slag him off I really do believe he has hit a brick wall at arsenal. If he came here I think Mancini would take him under his wing and turn him into a better player than he already is and would thrive here.

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

 

[TCIB]

I would take him like a shot.

I think he is played out of position, he should play through the middle. Skill,finishing and pace and more pace on top of that.

Do you think he has the mentality for that ? i mean he gets flustered pretty easy on the wing sometimes. Looking for passes in tight situations and that may not be his best thing ?.

 

[Chevelle]

I would take him like a shot.

I think he is played out of position, he should play through the middle. Skill,finishing and pace and more pace on top of that.

Problem is we have plenty of through the middle type players.. we need width

 

[NSBFL]

Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

With Walcott enterring the final year of his contract, there's a rumoured "knock down" price tag of 15mil. Chelsea / bin dippers interested. My question is... is he any better than Adam Johnson? Seriously? I think not! But would you have him in place of AJ?

 

[Roll On City]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

Walcott everyday

 

[Love_Each_Day]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

Walcott would be awful for our style of play so I wouldn't swap him for Johnson, for most teams in the premier league though I think Walcott would be more effective.

 

[BlakeTheBlue]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

Both are impact players who are most effective coming off the bench late on when the oposition are knackered. But neither of them are that great imo. I'd say all in all they are pretty much level in every area.

 

[Bill]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

lennon.

 

[Skashion]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

Adam Johnson. Don't even have to think about it.

 

[Blueboy Danny]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

I would actually say Walcott, I think Mancini would get the best out of him, look at other players in the City squad that hve improved under his mentorship, I also think Walcott has more scope for improvement than AJ.

 

[cyprustavern]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

Would prefer the ox...that kid has a lot of potential

 

[Blueboy Danny]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

Would prefer the ox...that kid has a lot of potential

Good point would like to see him at City.

 

[BlueBilly]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

lennon.

Behave.