Theresa May

Chippy_boy said:
Apart from Brexit, no, I haven't. In the staggeringly unlikely event that a party espousing your kind of politics were elected, they'd be kicked out again immediately afterwards. It won't happen of course. But if it did, it would be a blip, a temporary glitch, enabling people to see sense once more.
Click to expand...

I agree completely. Labour would lose in every metric of success from government, followed 4 years later by a sweep up of the mess by the Tories.
I can't stand the tories, but Labour are inept.
 
2sheikhs said:
He told us all how strong he was and how he could make tough decisions like somebody who was really strong.
Click to expand...
Pity he didn't get in then because if he had we could all be relaxing now complaining at most at Labour freezing energy prices and increasing public spending to invest in infrastructure and worrying about whether City were going to be champions again.
Instead due to call me Dave and the Tories we're looking at a national crisis and the possible break up of the United Kingdom.
 
Len Rum said:
Pity he didn't get in then because if he had we could all be relaxing now complaining at most at Labour freezing energy prices and increasing public spending to invest in infrastructure and worrying about whether City were going to be champions again.
Instead due to call me Dave and the Tories we're looking at a national crisis and the possible break up of the United Kingdom.
Click to expand...

rose-colored-glasses-emoticon.png
 
Len Rum said:
Pity he didn't get in then because if he had we could all be relaxing now complaining at most at Labour freezing energy prices and increasing public spending to invest in infrastructure and worrying about whether City were going to be champions again.
Instead due to call me Dave and the Tories we're looking at a national crisis and the possible break up of the United Kingdom.
Click to expand...

Ironic to think that Ed would have delivered a mildly dull Govt that no one had strong feelings about. Instead we elected a Tory Govt with a working majority for the first time in decades and within two years they had doused the country in petrol, set fire to it and then the PM buggered off.

Tossers.
 
Len Rum said:
Why's that then?
Ed was Tory light but without the referendum.
So nowt wrong with my scenario?.
Click to expand...

With Ed we'd still be in the EU, the already rich would still be making a fortune, the City of London would still be operating under the tight grip of please yourself regulation, there'd be a little bit of tinkering to stop disabled people killing themselves over benefit withdrawal, and he wouldn't have sent a bunch of old West Indian guys back to the Caribbean, but for the most part Tory Britain would have carried on carrying on
 
Last edited:
BobKowalski said:
Ironic to think that Ed would have delivered a mildly dull Govt that no one had strong feelings about. Instead we elected a Tory Govt with a working majority for the first time in decades and within two years they had doused the country in petrol, set fire to it and then the PM buggered off.

Tossers.
Click to expand...

Maybe you should be blaming your fellow countrymen/women. It became so bad that they voted them in twice, three times if you count coalitions!

May actually got more votes than Cameron did!
 
inbetween said:
Maybe you should be blaming your fellow countrymen/women. It became so bad that they voted them in twice, three times if you count coalitions!

May actually got more votes than Cameron did!
Click to expand...

I like to think if Cameron ran on a platform of dousing the country in petrol, setting fire to it and then fucking off he wouldn’t have got the votes. Strangely all I saw was things like ‘Conservatives believe in the EU Single Market and our membership of it’. Odd that he didn’t mention this was a lie and that burning everything to the ground was the Conservatives preferred economic policy.
 
BobKowalski said:
I like to think if Cameron ran on a platform of dousing the country in petrol, setting fire to it and then fucking off he wouldn’t have got the votes. Strangely all I saw was things like ‘Conservatives believe in the EU Single Market and our membership of it’. Odd that he didn’t mention this was a lie and that burning everything to the ground was the Conservatives preferred economic policy.
Click to expand...
Fair enough, but if Labour hadn't once again chosen the wrong leader and his brother had won, we may well not have had a referendum or if we did we would probably have had a more competent remain campaign from Labour.
 
blueparrot said:
Fair enough, but if Labour hadn't once again chosen the wrong leader and his brother had won, we may well not have had a referendum or if we did we would probably have had a more competent remain campaign from Labour.
Click to expand...

You know how Tories and Conservatives like to bang on about personal responsibility and all that? Well I think I’ll stick with the party and the PM who actually did the damage rather than blaming the opposition for not being the right sort of opposition. It’s called taking responsibility for your own actions. I’m sure it crops up in Tory electioneering literature a couple of hundred times on average.
 
BobKowalski said:
You know how Tories and Conservatives like to bang on about personal responsibility and all that? Well I think I’ll stick with the party and the PM who actually did the damage rather than blaming the opposition for not being the right sort of opposition. It’s called taking responsibility for your own actions. I’m sure it crops up in Tory electioneering literature a couple of hundred times on average.
Click to expand...

If we had a viable opposition the ****s wouldn't be in power.

We have to choose one of two unelectable bunch of fucking disgusting clowns & hope the least damage gets done.

It's worse than FIFA.
 
Neville Kneville said:
If we had a viable opposition the ****s wouldn't be in power.

We have to choose one of two unelectable bunch of fucking disgusting clowns & hope the least damage gets done.

It's worse than FIFA.
Click to expand...

Jesus, Mary and Joseph!...
If we had a viable opposition the ****s wouldn't be in power.
Click to expand...

Just listen to yourself! Kinnock wasn't viable, Brown wasn't viable, Ed wasn't viable and Corbyn fuck me! No way he's viable.

But presumably Blair was all sorts of viable for you.

And people criticise me for accusing Blairites of being Tories!

The only thing viable for you is miniscule variations on Tory.

Believe this if you believe nothing else I post, your inflexibility, which is typical of the inflexibility of the right in this country, is THE major factor in the rise of Corbyn.
 
The perfect fumble said:
Jesus, Mary and Joseph!...


Just listen to yourself! Kinnock wasn't viable, Brown wasn't viable, Ed wasn't viable and Corbyn fuck me! No way he's viable.

But presumably Blair was all sorts of viable for you.

And people criticise me for accusing Blairites of being Tories!

The only thing viable for you is miniscule variations on Tory.

Believe this if you believe nothing else I post, your inflexibility, which is typical of the inflexibility of the right in this country, is THE major factor in the rise of Corbyn.
Click to expand...

I seem to recall Blair was portrayed with devil eyes and the man who would destroy the country by adopting the Euro so not sure he was that viable for Tories and the right either.

Even more galling is that the UK is threatened more by Brexit and the willingness of Conservative Leavers who think Scottish independence or the return of the ‘troubles’ in NI is a price worth paying for English nationalism or Brexit as it’s more commonly known. Yet Labour or Corbyn (or any other past Labour leader) is somehow the ‘real threat’ to the UK. Tory voters. You have to wonder if they’re aware they are talking shite or they just can’t tell it’s shite.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top