The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
I disagree with you there Rascal. I very much doubt that ex/current hedge fund millionaires are there to do any good for anyone other than themselves and their ilk. Now, it might be that Lisa Nandy is also there to represent herself and her ilk however, there are a lot more people in this country like Lisa Nandy than there are like JRM.I think mate you are looking at it from a party political perspective where as my intention was to look at it from an individual MPs perspective. By that I mean say are Lisa Nandy and Rees-Mogg both in Parliament with the best of intentions. I do honestly believe that they both believe they are there to do good. Now whilst I may fundamentally disagree with both of them on issues and they may be following party guidance as part of collective responsibility that does not change their intentions on entering Parliament. They may have to support what I would consider awful and odious legislation, yet still retain their good intentions. Obviously though the question becomes what are good intentions and the only answer I have to that is the ballot box.
Which takes me back to one of my original concerns, thinking that MPs are all the same is a threat to Democracy and the best way to measure any MPs intentions is through an election and if we begin to consider MPs as being all the same I worry that affects voter turnout, it de-legitimises mandates and support for Parliament falls further. That could create a vacuum and authoritarians exploit vacuums.
As for your last point, I sincerely hope there is a huge amount of tactical voting at the next election and a progressive alliance just brings in PR, no referendum needed, which should keep the Tories out of government in perpetuity.