This guy determined we will fail FFPR

[Damocles]

Should the rest of us leave you two alone or what?

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Should the rest of us leave you two alone or what?

I was always told never to be alone with strange men.

 

[Chippy_boy]

How can you be so bothered about these people who apparently know fuck all and presumably are embarrassing themselves with every next utterance on our financial situation. Let the fuckers hang themselves.

Because these fuckers go on TalkSport for example as an "expert opinion".

Now 100,000 people "know" that City are going to fail FFP because they've heard an "expert".

Now instead of correcting a single fuckwit, you have to correct 100,000 fuckwits parroting an opinion.

I don't enjoy being surrounded by fuckwits parroting their latest bullshit without bothering to find out whether it's right.

And when we don't fail they will feel silly or a little deflated.

I think you are kind of missing the point. When we don't fail FFP, articles like these will just make people think we must have cheated and they will hate us even more. You might say so what, But that's really rather shortsighted. Building a successful business and worldwide brand is about attracting people to you because they respect and admire you. This is not made easier if large sections of the populous are brainwashed into thinking we are cheating twats.

It is no coincidence that the most successful manager the UK has ever seen chose to keep the media under such a tight reign. It's because he understood entirely the importance of keeping the club portrayed in the best light at all times.

 

[Damocles]

So you're under protective custody then?

 

[Tim of the Oak]

Did anyone else hear Conn on talksh*t about half hour ago regurgitating the same innuendos " - huge rise in revenues , where did that come from - interested to see because most of City's sponsors come from Abu Dhabi "
He could not have made it clearer what he meant.

Conn is a man who knows a great deal about football, City and finances yet has decided to dedicate this knowledge towards his ideology.

His ideology is not shared by me and I feel that it often taints his opinion and his objectivism to the point of shaping debates to suit.

lol. didn't hear it, but I'd happily wager he ignored the trend towards a higher proportion of our sponsors not being from Abu Dhabi as well.

He got timed out so hardly had a chance for negativity never mind a balanced report. Yes we do great as a result of Abu Dhabi sponsors and now we restrict the number of commercial deals with UAE sources.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

So you're under protective custody then?

I am, although GH has promised me some 'ancillary relief', which sounds very pleasant.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

So you're under protective custody then?

I am, although GH has promised me some 'ancillary relief', which sounds very pleasant.

Why does every thread you post in seem to descend from Premier League level to somewhere around Evo-Stick Northern League level?

 

[aguero93:20]

So you're under protective custody then?

I am, although GH has promised me some 'ancillary relief', which sounds very pleasant.

Why does every thread you post in seem to descend from Premier League level to somewhere around Evo-Stick Northern League level?

highlands league more like.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

So you're under protective custody then?

I am, although GH has promised me some 'ancillary relief', which sounds very pleasant.

Why does every thread you post in seem to descend from Premier League level to somewhere around Evo-Stick Northern League level?

It's my way of blending in with the natives.

 

[pride in battle]

I originally asked him to come on here which he did, I have asked him again to explain his latest ramblings.....

Thompson?

I'd have that **** for dinner and still leave room for a balti pie.

Tell him to pop over.

Yep, the one and only....

 

[Damocles]

I originally asked him to come on here which he did, I have asked him again to explain his latest ramblings.....

Thompson?

I'd have that **** for dinner and still leave room for a balti pie.

Tell him to pop over.

Yep, the one and only....

What's his username?

 

[aguero93:20]

Thompson?

I'd have that **** for dinner and still leave room for a balti pie.

Tell him to pop over.

Yep, the one and only....

What's his username?

ffplay, change it to something ridiculous when/if he comes back though

 

[80s Shorts]

Because these fuckers go on TalkSport for example as an "expert opinion".

Now 100,000 people "know" that City are going to fail FFP because they've heard an "expert".

Now instead of correcting a single fuckwit, you have to correct 100,000 fuckwits parroting an opinion.

I don't enjoy being surrounded by fuckwits parroting their latest bullshit without bothering to find out whether it's right.

And when we don't fail they will feel silly or a little deflated.

I think you are kind of missing the point. When we don't fail FFP, articles like these will just make people think we must have cheated and they will hate us even more. You might say so what, But that's really rather shortsighted. Building a successful business and worldwide brand is about attracting people to you because they respect and admire you. This is not made easier if large sections of the populous are brainwashed into thinking we are cheating twats.

It is no coincidence that the most successful manager the UK has ever seen chose to keep the media under such a tight reign. It's because he understood entirely the importance of keeping the club portrayed in the best light at all times.

Which people will think we,ve cheated, which people will hate us even more ? Scum fans ? Arse fans ? Dippers ? at what point do we get these people "on board". Never obviously.

The "worldwide brand" does not seem to be being harmed by the usual tabloid shite, as seen in the latest financial projections.

As far as your last paragraph, it is widely acknowledged that the scum under purple nose was one of the most hated clubs in the country outside their own fan base. He didn't care if they were hated or not and it made little difference to his success.

 

[aguero93:20]

And when we don't fail they will feel silly or a little deflated.

I think you are kind of missing the point. When we don't fail FFP, articles like these will just make people think we must have cheated and they will hate us even more. You might say so what, But that's really rather shortsighted. Building a successful business and worldwide brand is about attracting people to you because they respect and admire you. This is not made easier if large sections of the populous are brainwashed into thinking we are cheating twats.

It is no coincidence that the most successful manager the UK has ever seen chose to keep the media under such a tight reign. It's because he understood entirely the importance of keeping the club portrayed in the best light at all times.

Which people will think we,ve cheated, which people will hate us even more ? Scum fans ? Arse fans ? Dippers ? at what point do we get these people "on board". Never obviously.

The "worldwide brand" does not seem to be being harmed by the usual tabloid shite, as seen in the latest financial projections.

As far as your last paragraph, it is widely acknowledged that the scum under purple nose was one of the most hated clubs in the country outside their own fan base. He didn't care if they were hated or not and it made little difference to his success.

sorry but how do you know it hasn't? brand image is absolutely massive, why else do you think we've overtaken chelski if not for the fact that their players and staff are so bloody unlikable? for all you or I know that turnover figure could have been 10-15% higher without the constant storm of shit we've had to endure from the media over the last 5 years.
that's why I care. tell me something, why don't you?

 

[pride in battle]

Thompson?

I'd have that **** for dinner and still leave room for a balti pie.

Tell him to pop over.

Yep, the one and only....

What's his username?

@EdThompson

 

[80s Shorts]

I think you are kind of missing the point. When we don't fail FFP, articles like these will just make people think we must have cheated and they will hate us even more. You might say so what, But that's really rather shortsighted. Building a successful business and worldwide brand is about attracting people to you because they respect and admire you. This is not made easier if large sections of the populous are brainwashed into thinking we are cheating twats.

It is no coincidence that the most successful manager the UK has ever seen chose to keep the media under such a tight reign. It's because he understood entirely the importance of keeping the club portrayed in the best light at all times.

Which people will think we,ve cheated, which people will hate us even more ? Scum fans ? Arse fans ? Dippers ? at what point do we get these people "on board". Never obviously.

The "worldwide brand" does not seem to be being harmed by the usual tabloid shite, as seen in the latest financial projections.

As far as your last paragraph, it is widely acknowledged that the scum under purple nose was one of the most hated clubs in the country outside their own fan base. He didn't care if they were hated or not and it made little difference to his success.

sorry but how do you know it hasn't? brand image is absolutely massive, why else do you think we've overtaken chelski if not for the fact that their players and staff are so bloody unlikable? for all you or I know that turnover figure could have been 10-15% higher without the constant storm of shit we've had to endure from the media over the last 5 years.
that's why I care. tell me something, why don't you?

and for all you know it would not have been.

So in your opinion we have overtaken Chelsea's turnover because nobody likes them ?!

Rather than the fact that we are being run both on and off the pitch impeccably. You really think that. Laughable.

 

[aguero93:20]

Which people will think we,ve cheated, which people will hate us even more ? Scum fans ? Arse fans ? Dippers ? at what point do we get these people "on board". Never obviously.

The "worldwide brand" does not seem to be being harmed by the usual tabloid shite, as seen in the latest financial projections.

As far as your last paragraph, it is widely acknowledged that the scum under purple nose was one of the most hated clubs in the country outside their own fan base. He didn't care if they were hated or not and it made little difference to his success.

sorry but how do you know it hasn't? brand image is absolutely massive, why else do you think we've overtaken chelski if not for the fact that their players and staff are so bloody unlikable? for all you or I know that turnover figure could have been 10-15% higher without the constant storm of shit we've had to endure from the media over the last 5 years.
that's why I care. tell me something, why don't you?

and for all you know it would not have been.

So in your opinion we have overtaken Chelsea's turnover because nobody likes them ?!

Rather than the fact that we are being run both on and off the pitch impeccably. You really think that. Laughable.

and you can't see that our club being badmouthed in the press damages the efforts put in on and off the pitch and you think I'm laughable?

 

[Chippy_boy]

Which people will think we,ve cheated, which people will hate us even more ? Scum fans ? Arse fans ? Dippers ? at what point do we get these people "on board". Never obviously.

The "worldwide brand" does not seem to be being harmed by the usual tabloid shite, as seen in the latest financial projections.

As far as your last paragraph, it is widely acknowledged that the scum under purple nose was one of the most hated clubs in the country outside their own fan base. He didn't care if they were hated or not and it made little difference to his success.

sorry but how do you know it hasn't? brand image is absolutely massive, why else do you think we've overtaken chelski if not for the fact that their players and staff are so bloody unlikable? for all you or I know that turnover figure could have been 10-15% higher without the constant storm of shit we've had to endure from the media over the last 5 years.
that's why I care. tell me something, why don't you?

and for all you know it would not have been.

So in your opinion we have overtaken Chelsea's turnover because nobody likes them ?!

Rather than the fact that we are being run both on and off the pitch impeccably. You really think that. Laughable.

Your just digging a huge hole trying to defend an indefensible stance mate.

Any cretin can understand how important brand image is. Shell, won't even let anyone put the shell logo on a bit of PR for example, they are so protective and controlling about it.

To try to say that it doesn't matter that people libel us in national newspapers, is quite frankly ridiculous.

 

[80s Shorts]

sorry but how do you know it hasn't? brand image is absolutely massive, why else do you think we've overtaken chelski if not for the fact that their players and staff are so bloody unlikable? for all you or I know that turnover figure could have been 10-15% higher without the constant storm of shit we've had to endure from the media over the last 5 years.
that's why I care. tell me something, why don't you?

and for all you know it would not have been.

So in your opinion we have overtaken Chelsea's turnover because nobody likes them ?!

Rather than the fact that we are being run both on and off the pitch impeccably. You really think that. Laughable.

and you can't see that our club being badmouthed in the press damages the efforts put in on and off the pitch and you think I'm laughable?

No, I think that your opinion that we have overtaken Chelsea's turnover because nobody likes them is laughable.

I don't worry so much about this as I have 100% confidence in our owners in what they are doing.

However, I can rest assured and sleep easy at night knowing that you are watching our backs.

Goodnight.

 

[Skashion]

I don't even feel the need to justify why -£75m is so wrong. In three weeks, a month tops, I will be shown to be right.

Just £23.4m out eh Ed?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMa0CxgCqiM[/youtube]