If you were Hazard and you looked at both our midfield and Chelsea's, which would you think you have a better chance playing regularly in? A manager's word isn't everything.LoveCity said:pudge said:He's already admitted that playing time was pivotal and he wasn't guaranteed a starting place in our team.
Do you really think we didn't guarantee him regular playing time when we were willing to go over £30million? He'd walk into our team on this form, Silva isn't close in his form and even in form Nasri isn't as impressive.
Are you Steve, sorry, Shteve McLaren?Dzeko's Right Boot said:Fantastic finish by Torresh.
jimharri said:Are you Steve, sorry, Shteve McLaren?Dzeko's Right Boot said:Fantastic finish by Torresh.
pudge said:If you were Hazard and you looked at both our midfield and Chelsea's, which would you think you have a better chance playing regularly in? A manager's word isn't everything.
And Hazard will have a dip in form much like Silva, and every other player. You'd think Chelsea had signed Messi, Xavi and Iniesta going off here.
WHile he is ver good at his current rate he would have near on 100 assists by the season end and its just not possible even Messi struggles to do that and he is a complete wankerLoveCity said:pudge said:If you were Hazard and you looked at both our midfield and Chelsea's, which would you think you have a better chance playing regularly in? A manager's word isn't everything.
Once again, Chelsea weren't even in the equation when we were dithering over the agent fees, if we had given in to the admittedly obscene demands that were confirmed by every credible journo in the country then he would have been ours before 6th place Chelsea did the thing that gave them the extra pull - won the Champions League.
And Hazard will have a dip in form much like Silva, and every other player. You'd think Chelsea had signed Messi, Xavi and Iniesta going off here.
No, they signed a player widely recognised as one of the best young players in the world and he's showing it already. Every player dips in and out of form but it's pretty clear he is a talent of the highest quality, and that's why we were willing to pay so much for him, but weren't willing to go the extra mile to get it done quick.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2139714/Eden-Hazard-given-house-tour-Manchester-City.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... -City.html</a>
Maybe his agent was fucking us about with the fee to keep his options open?LoveCity said:pudge said:If you were Hazard and you looked at both our midfield and Chelsea's, which would you think you have a better chance playing regularly in? A manager's word isn't everything.
Once again, Chelsea weren't even in the equation when we were dithering over the agent fees, if we had given in to the admittedly obscene demands that were confirmed by every credible journo in the country then he would have been ours before 6th place Chelsea did the thing that gave them the extra pull - won the Champions League.
And Hazard will have a dip in form much like Silva, and every other player. You'd think Chelsea had signed Messi, Xavi and Iniesta going off here.
No, they signed a player widely recognised as one of the best young players in the world and he's showing it already. Every player dips in and out of form but it's pretty clear he is a talent of the highest quality, and that's why we were willing to pay so much for him, but weren't willing to go the extra mile to get it done quick.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2139714/Eden-Hazard-given-house-tour-Manchester-City.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... -City.html</a>