Prestwich_Blue said:
Blue Maverick said:
Maybe but it doesn't look good on TV or add to atmosphere, plus factor in what those extra 7000 may spend at the stadium and shop etc.
I'm not saying it's right and in fact I'm just writing an article for KOTK about this very subject.
But we have to face the fact we're run by accountants and marketing people now. I absolutely agree that having a full, noisy stadium looks far better than one with loads of empty seats. The former actually encourages people to want to become part of it in my view whereas once you see empty seats you tend to think "Well I can always get a ticket when I want one" or "I'm not bothering making the effort to go as it looks dead."
What is the cut-off point though?
Would City be happy with 20,000 tickets sold at £120? That'd make £0.4m more than 40,000 at £50 for example.
I think the first sign of problems with these new hikes was right away - Liverpool at home barely sold out, our first home game against last year's
champions runners-up. Two seasons ago this would have been sold out 3-4 weeks in advance, but London prices made it a very late sell out. Same prices next season in the expanded stadium would mean lots of empty seats.