A
A
Anonymous
Guest
Damocles said:
Go have a read of the thread again you fucking hypocrite.
And then if there's anything you want to add send me a PM.
Go have a read of the thread again you fucking hypocrite.
And then if there's anything you want to add send me a PM.
twinkletoes
Well-Known Member
BillyShears said:
No keep it live on here so we can all read it.
BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 20,331
Danamy said:
Nothing will change your view?
I would sincerely hope that the owners are not myopic enough to implement a change in manager based on circumstances from 2 years ago. A lot has happened in 2 years and any change in manager must surely be based on a) what is happening currently ie results, performances etc and b) the long term vision for the club and the way it wishes to portray itself and the philosophy that underpins it.
What looks a good idea 2 years ago doesn't make it a good idea now. For the owners to preclude employing any other manager other than Jose based on what they thought 2 years ago is frankly stupid.
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 30,670
Been busy for a few hours so only just caught up with the thread.
What is it with people on here that attempt make a decent thread turn sour?
FFS it's a healthy debate about backing Bob and then exploring the options if he fails to deliver which obviously would include Jose.
What's so hard to understand?
What is it with people on here that attempt make a decent thread turn sour?
FFS it's a healthy debate about backing Bob and then exploring the options if he fails to deliver which obviously would include Jose.
What's so hard to understand?
BillyShears said:
And I know what you're referring to, which made a valid point that you obviously didn't pick up on. You "intuition" is NOT fact, no matter how much you like to repeat it.
You need to calm down Billy lad, I don't know why you get so upset with it all
Danamy
Well-Known Member
Damocles said:
It would of been a lot more if we gave him what he wanted in the summer.
My statement is for what he wants in this window, which is what this thread is about, but you knew that anyway didn't you?
It's a lot of money if we come up short isn't it?...........
Danamy said:
But none of us particularly know what he wants, the current financial situation regarding our compliance with FFP, the availability of players that he wants or their willingness to move, etc.
That's an awful lot of variables to be guessing on to state that the board are not giving him what he wants.
In fact, you can also say that the Glazers are obviously not backing Ferguson because he hasn't spent any money in the window despite needing/"wanting" new players.
twinkletoes
Well-Known Member
This is getting confusing, I thought Damocles was a full paid up member of the cabal.
Maybe the players Mancini wants just can't be bought, which might frustrate him but that's life. We're clearly trying to get De Rossi for example but it just isn't likely to happen because of his attachment to Roma. Thiago Silva seems to be the defender he admires most but there is a 0% chance of that happening right now with him at Champions League chasing Milan and a hero to their fans. Then there are two others he admires, Cavani and Lavezzi, Napoli remain in the Champions League and De Laurenitis will simply not sell them until summer.
People go on and on about players like Samba and Ba who we could possibly get but it's quite possible Mancini just doesn't want them as we aren't even linked with these names.
I mean the board are still spending quietly on youth players like Pozo and are trying to sign others like Zouma and Shaw, so it's not like the wallet is completely shut.
People go on and on about players like Samba and Ba who we could possibly get but it's quite possible Mancini just doesn't want them as we aren't even linked with these names.
I mean the board are still spending quietly on youth players like Pozo and are trying to sign others like Zouma and Shaw, so it's not like the wallet is completely shut.