Today's shooting in America thread


I’m serious. It’s one thing having a nutbag President that’s a risk to world peace and sharing an opinion on that... but this is a specific constitutional change that is none of our business.

Something happened in the 1770’s, not sure what, but Britain agreed to back off from American domestic policy.
 
I’m serious. It’s one thing having a nutbag President that’s a risk to world peace and sharing an opinion on that... but this is a specific constitutional change that is none of our business.

Something happened in the 1770’s, not sure what, but Britain agreed to back off from American domestic policy.
You don’t have to convince me
 
What if you're Mexican and a relative of someone killed by smuggled guns from the USA?

Research has shown that many weapons and arms trafficked into Mexico are from gun dealers in the United States via straw purchasers.[102] In response to a 2009 GAO report, the DHS pointed out that the "majority" were 3,480 U.S. origin guns of 4,000 successfully traceable by ATF. These were the arms investigated out a total of 30,000 firearms seized in Mexico 2004 to 2008.[103] Most of the weapons end up in the hands of cartels

To further demonstrate the point, the USA is primary source country of semi-automatic Kalashnikov assault weapons into Mexico. There is a law that bans assault weapons in the USA but it only applies to weapons made after 1986, the majority of automatic weapons would have been produced in the cold war era, so it doesn't apply anyway.

Just a point to demonstrate that "this is a matter for Americans" is a bit simplistic for a world in which none of us live in a bubble (individually or collectively) free of consequences to or from the wider world outside. I don't think this would be a useful or persuasive argument with the gun nuts of why they should disarm in favour of aiding better social conditions for Mexicans.
 
A couple of articles on the positive correlation that gun laws have on increasing police violence and killings by officers.



America doesn't come out favourably in that list. The countries that are worse are often ridden with endemic drug trafficking led organised criminality, authoritarian systems of government or are other countries with lax gun laws.

 
I have seen a couple of vids about this particular incident. Kurt Andras Reinhold has come from the alcohol store and has crossed a road. 2 officers are sat in a patrol car and witness this action. You will hear the discussion about it prior to the incident.

You will also see different angles of the incident and you can draw your own conclusions on why the police thought the end result was 'justified'.

Please note the original 'offence' is not actioned 98% of the time and the action is not viewed as lawful considering the end result.

 
I have seen a couple of vids about this particular incident. Kurt Andras Reinhold has come from the alcohol store and has crossed a road. 2 officers are sat in a patrol car and witness this action. You will hear the discussion about it prior to the incident.

You will also see different angles of the incident and you can draw your own conclusions on why the police thought the end result was 'justified'.

Please note the original 'offence' is not actioned 98% of the time and the action is not viewed as lawful considering the end result.



Land of the free can't even cross the road however you want, honestly scumbags.
 
I have seen a couple of vids about this particular incident. Kurt Andras Reinhold has come from the alcohol store and has crossed a road. 2 officers are sat in a patrol car and witness this action. You will hear the discussion about it prior to the incident.

You will also see different angles of the incident and you can draw your own conclusions on why the police thought the end result was 'justified'.

Please note the original 'offence' is not actioned 98% of the time and the action is not viewed as lawful considering the end result.



The stock answer is that he resisted arrest, he should have complied but.... and this is a big but.

Being shot for crossing the road? What a miserable world we live in. If two coppers can't detain one person without keeping a close eye on their firearms during the process it's negligent to say the least.

I'd like to add a caveat to that though, I have some experience in subduing individuals who don't comply and in no confrontation have I ever thought about shooting the individual, although I am not an American copper so I can't speak for how they feel or mitigate the threats they face.

Sad loss of life whatever the moral decision you come to on this.
 
The stock answer is that he resisted arrest, he should have complied but.... and this is a big but.

Being shot for crossing the road? What a miserable world we live in. If two coppers can't detain one person without keeping a close eye on their firearms during the process it's negligent to say the least.

I'd like to add a caveat to that though, I have some experience in subduing individuals who don't comply and in no confrontation have I ever thought about shooting the individual, although I am not an American copper so I can't speak for how they feel or mitigate the threats they face.

Sad loss of life whatever the moral decision you come to on this.
At no point was the guy who was shot under arrest. He was free to walk away at any point. The police officers escalated the situation, and someone is dead as a result.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top