I think a lot of mistaking a narrative that a lot of those that voted for corbyn in the 1st leadership election were voting for him or this percieved cult of personality, they weren't, they were voting for an idea that labour would reject the "tory lite" as it is termed direction of the party and yes the left wing cranks like swp and it's ilk latched on, but I and many I know in the local party would have voted McDonald if he had stood instead of corbyn in the 1st election as it was about the partys future, not the person.
I don't know anyone who would have voted kendal or cooper, in fact if jezza hadn't stood Burnham would be leader now.
Anyway 2nd election, if a credible left of centre candidate with similar views as corbyn, but not in such an imobile way (like the future of nuclear power which cost them copeland), but they didn't a twat called smith did.
Corbyn has been elected twice only because he isn't a member of the progress wing of the party, I would have him fucked off tomorrow if the leadership callengers weren't also shit as he's becoming a liability with his stuborness and single minded stances.
As for momentun, they are daft twats as much as progress, both should be banned in my opinion from being associated and member barred from being in them and labour.
As for the guardian, I read it and the independant amd huff post, as do a lot of working class people, another narrative set, if you read a broadsheet you are some kind of elitish snob, champaigne socialist, 1are you fuck, you just realise the red tops are akin to reading the beano or dandy for any news of merit, and tbf the guardian hates corbyn, they are a pro lib dem paper and do at least a couple of labour negative stories each week.
Corbyn goes tomorrow I wouldn't care, but labour lurching back to the right would kill it as much as keeping the old bugger in charge