Total Premiership spending....

[tonea2003]

i suppose you have to take the last two seasons out of the equation as we are using the sheiks back pocket cash, under normal circumstances we wouldn't have spent nowhere near that amount.

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

i suppose you have to take the last two seasons out of the equation as we are using the sheiks back pocket cash, under normal circumstances we wouldn't have spent nowhere near that amount.

Disregarding the Sheikh's investment we'd be -£107,515,800.

 

[brooklandsblue2.0]

Premiership Transfer Profit(since 1997/98):

Manchester United -£214,380,000.
Chelsea -£501,102,000.
Liverpool -£223,158,600.
Arsenal -£27,958,500.
Everton -£47,970,000.
Aston Villa -£140,148,000.
Tottenham -£298,642,500.
Man City -£331,188,300.

Any other clubs you want?

Thanks very much for this LoB, but does anyone have just the total amounts spent on transfers?

 

[BlueBas]

i suppose you have to take the last two seasons out of the equation as we are using the sheiks back pocket cash, under normal circumstances we wouldn't have spent nowhere near that amount.

Disregarding the Sheikh's investment we'd be -£107,515,800.

And if you take out the last couple of years then United's would be closer to £300million (minus Ronaldo's move to Madrid)

 

[Matty]

Some other clubs transfer profits:

Portsmouth +£16,276,500.
Leeds -£20,533,500.
Newcastle -£135,072,000.

It really does beggar belief how Pompey can have made a £16m profit in transfers over the last decade yet still be in their current financial meltdown, they must have been paying wages and signing on fees that were astronomical.

 

[tonea2003]

Premiership Transfer Profit(since 1997/98):

Manchester United -£214,380,000.
Chelsea -£501,102,000.
Liverpool -£223,158,600.
Arsenal -£27,958,500.
Everton -£47,970,000.
Aston Villa -£140,148,000.
Tottenham -£298,642,500.
Man City -£331,188,300.

Any other clubs you want?

Thanks very much for this LoB, but does anyone have just the total amounts spent on transfers?

get on soccerbase and add it up youself, lazy get :-)

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

Transfer Expenditure since 97/98:

1) Chelsea-£732,640,500.
2) Tottenham-£499,977,000.
3) Liverpool-£491,249,700.
4) Man Utd: £490,176,000.
5) Man City-£453,037,500.
6) Arsenal-£275,989,500.
7) Aston Villa-£260,914,500.
8) Everton-£226,138,500.

 

[Braggster]

Some other clubs transfer profits:

Portsmouth +£16,276,500.
Leeds -£20,533,500.
Newcastle -£135,072,000.

It really does beggar belief how Pompey can have made a £16m profit in transfers over the last decade yet still be in their current financial meltdown, they must have been paying wages and signing on fees that were astronomical.

Part of the answer is, in Pompey's case, to regard the reported figures with extreme suspicion.

 

[Joycee Banercheck]

Transfer Expenditure since 97/98:

1) Chelsea-£732,640,500.
2) Tottenham-£499,977,000.
3) Liverpool-£491,249,700.
4) Man Utd: £490,176,000.
5) Man City-£453,037,500.
6) Arsenal-£275,989,500.
7) Aston Villa-£260,914,500.
8) Everton-£226,138,500.

Spurs have spent a fair bit haven't they? I suppose that's what happens though when you sell your squad and then buy it all back a year later.

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

It really does beggar belief how Pompey can have made a £16m profit in transfers over the last decade yet still be in their current financial meltdown, they must have been paying wages and signing on fees that were astronomical.

Part of the answer is, in Pompey's case, to regard the reported figures with extreme suspicion.

and the dodgy ownership deals<br /><br />-- Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:35 pm --<br /><br />

Transfer Expenditure since 97/98:

1) Chelsea-£732,640,500.
2) Tottenham-£499,977,000.
3) Liverpool-£491,249,700.
4) Man Utd: £490,176,000.
5) Man City-£453,037,500.
6) Arsenal-£275,989,500.
7) Aston Villa-£260,914,500.
8) Everton-£226,138,500.

Spurs have spent a fair bit haven't they? I suppose that's what happens though when you sell your squad and then buy it all back a year later.

the thing I find amazing is that Spurs and Liverpool have spent in total £200m more than Arsenal over a sustained period of time and yet they have very little to show for it.