nijinsky's fetlocks
Well-Known Member
johnmc said:nijinsky's fetlocks said:You and I know that this simply won't happen - the courts of every country in the world would have a backlog of cases that would never be heard, and the legal system would grind to a halt if everyone with a legitimate or perceived grievance sought justice in this way.
How many hundreds of thousands of folk do you think are threatened on the web every day?
I always aim for double figures myself, but some folk are even more prolific.
You would need thousands of moderators working 24/7 to keep a lid on things, and tracking offending folk down would prove to be a logistical nightmare.
Fake Facebook and Twitter accounts are ten a penny, and what about folk who use a shared computer, or use those in libraries or schools?
Ridding the internet of racism and hatred is a most laudable aim, but utterly impossible to achieve in the real world.
But a few keywords get flagged and the people using these are banned - i bet its not that difficult.
I've never found it that difficult getting banned at all - it's staying online that I find problematical.
Even keywords present problems - I read an article the other day about how paedophiles on the internet have effectively created buzzwords to conceal their actual content and purpose, so that they fly under any moderators radar, and communicate unhampered and undetected, as nobody other than fellow nonces clock it.