Apparently so but in the end he didn't play as he was doing community service.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Txiki Begiristain
- Thread starter cookster
- Start date
Super-Barwuah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 355
LMAO!.......seriouslyAshley Williams. He'd add a bit of steel to our back 4.
LMAO!.......seriously
I think he was joking mate.
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 30,636
Probably watching Pickford seeing as Ederson is looking a bit shaky.I think he was joking mate.
jimharri
Moderator
Joking? Moi?I think he was joking mate.
Tevez City
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 May 2010
- Messages
- 13,845
Net Transfer Spend (2010-17):
1. Man City - £815M
2. PSG - £662M
3. Man United - £647M
4. Chelsea - £396M
5. Barcelona - £301M
6. Juventus - £294M
7. Bayern Munich - £268M
8. Liverpool - £223M
9. Arsenal - £219M
10. Real Madrid - £172M
I understand that from the takeover the club had to pay above the market price in terms of fees and wages to attract the best talents, but after that we should do it better and spend wisely but unfortunatelly we didnt sort out yet.
1. Man City - £815M
2. PSG - £662M
3. Man United - £647M
4. Chelsea - £396M
5. Barcelona - £301M
6. Juventus - £294M
7. Bayern Munich - £268M
8. Liverpool - £223M
9. Arsenal - £219M
10. Real Madrid - £172M
I understand that from the takeover the club had to pay above the market price in terms of fees and wages to attract the best talents, but after that we should do it better and spend wisely but unfortunatelly we didnt sort out yet.
Net Transfer Spend (2010-17):
1. Man City - £815M
2. PSG - £662M
3. Man United - £647M
4. Chelsea - £396M
5. Barcelona - £301M
6. Juventus - £294M
7. Bayern Munich - £268M
8. Liverpool - £223M
9. Arsenal - £219M
10. Real Madrid - £172M
I understand that from the takeover the club had to pay above the market price in terms of fees and wages to attract the best talents, but after that we should do it better and spend wisely but unfortunatelly we didnt sort out yet.
I hope our net spend is always stupidly high.
I want us to buy players when they're on the up, keep them until they're over 30 and worthless.
English teams who have low net spends are teams who sell their best players. Bring it down with some academy or investment players who can't make it here but get sold for a few million profit, but otherwise keep that spend high.
Last edited:
Gremlin
Well-Known Member
Chelsea have a lower net spend than us and are probably kicking themselves for having sold KdB, Salah, Lukaku etc. It's not necessarily a good thing.
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
What does our net spend between 2010 and 2013 have to do with Txiki? May as well ask why he thought signing Corradi and Samaras was a good idea.Net Transfer Spend (2010-17):
1. Man City - £815M
2. PSG - £662M
3. Man United - £647M
4. Chelsea - £396M
5. Barcelona - £301M
6. Juventus - £294M
7. Bayern Munich - £268M
8. Liverpool - £223M
9. Arsenal - £219M
10. Real Madrid - £172M
I understand that from the takeover the club had to pay above the market price in terms of fees and wages to attract the best talents, but after that we should do it better and spend wisely but unfortunatelly we didnt sort out yet.
Net Transfer Spend (2010-17):
1. Man City - £815M
2. PSG - £662M
3. Man United - £647M
4. Chelsea - £396M
5. Barcelona - £301M
6. Juventus - £294M
7. Bayern Munich - £268M
8. Liverpool - £223M
9. Arsenal - £219M
10. Real Madrid - £172M
I understand that from the takeover the club had to pay above the market price in terms of fees and wages to attract the best talents, but after that we should do it better and spend wisely but unfortunatelly we didnt sort out yet.
Why 2010? This thread is about Txiki.