Of course, if I'm wrong and this hasn't come from City, then the fact it appeared just minutes after the rags are stuffed by the mighty Burnley at home, for the first time since 1962, might offer a clue as to who might have been behind it.
Colin I know you two are friends and you respect him but for the life of me that’s not a balanced piece.
Saying City deny the UEFA findings every so often does not put any of our side of the argument. The least, the very least, he could have done was to point out the change in rules after City lodged their accounts and ask why.
The trouble with Conn is not that he is a racist or even anti City it’s that he doesn’t agree with the monetisation of his favourite game.
He should take lessons from a proper Journalist such as Martin Samuel who is the only guy to see that FFP is way of preventing investment of clubs wishing to catch the established elite. That’s the story.
The complete pass that Liverpool get by the press, other than The Times is sickening. He should look at what’s going on there too.
Conn has one story and it’s constantly regurgitated. I highly doubt this has anything to do with City.
He might be a nice guy and even informed but he is biased and doesn’t have a good word for us.
That piece and it’s timing is indefensible in my opinion. Like many blues I have not only lost respect for him I find him boring and I’m sick of him now. He's turning into Shindler. It's a shame because I enjoyed Richer than God.
I don't understand what his problem is. We get that he thinks City have broken some half arsed possibly illegal rule. Has he got anything else to say?
Best keep an eye on the richest club in the World in case they go bust. Maybe write something on how on earth Bury went bust with FFP to protect them.
