UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[Shirley]

Tom Morgan at the DT....

New details emerge over Man City's dispute with Uefa prior to 2014 FFP sanctions.

 

[Kompany Car]

What’s a four letter word starting in C and with N as the third letter?

Cone ? Are there any more questions for yesterday’s crossword?

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

Tom Morgan at the DT....

New details emerge over Man City's dispute with Uefa prior to 2014 FFP sanctions.

As if by magic...

 

[Asa's left peg]

The article in the Telegraph infers the club cannot discuss the details of the agreement in 2014 because of a confidentiality clause. It does sound as if there was some stuff that UEFA didn't want to come out.

 

[KS55]

The article in the Telegraph infers the club cannot discuss the details of the agreement in 2014 because of a confidentiality clause. It does sound as if there was some stuff that UEFA didn't want to come out.

Like rewriting the rules?

 

[Asa's left peg]

Like rewriting the rules?

Exactly this. Its refered to in the article. I get the impression the scribbler wants to say something but can't. He refers to Cunnts, sorry Conns piece in the Guardian in inverted commas but still uses the word 'leaked' instead of 'hacked'. Its interesting if you read between the lines. imho.

 

[asahartford1]

Of course, if I'm wrong and this hasn't come from City, then the fact it appeared just minutes after the rags are stuffed by the mighty Burnley at home, for the first time since 1962, might offer a clue as to who might have been behind it.

David Conn ?

 

[Fordyboy46]

Funny how this has resurfaced when we've started to string some results together again. They're hurting badly after we failed to implode after the Wolves defeat, that's what they all hope when we suffer a defeat ,pure implosion but it never happens you utter twats.

 

[richards30]

What a piece of shit this Conn 'article' is.

Just for the record, as apparently the Liverpool hacking scandal has been deemed historical and settled at the time by the entire media, barring The Times, can Conn and his collaborators point out the difference between the two ongoing investigations?

Nope?

This is clearly another article to leave mud attached.

However, any City fan worth their salt, knew the details of why and how Uefa reached its previous ruling.

I wonder if the Guardian's puff piece will be picked up elsewhere...

but why don’t we come out in public all guns blazing for a change? I understand we have to be a bit smart until they rule first but FFS we seem to sit and let the world believe all this bollocks!

 

[give it to gordon]

I am sick to death with the shit press/media in the this country. Why is it against the 'rules' for a business person to but a company and invest as much money as he wants to try and make it a success. These rules were only brought in after the City take over. I would have thought these rules were against some sort of freedom to trade as it reduces your chances of making your company successful. Sounds like forming a cartel a monopoly to protect the old business, which I thought wasnt allowed in business.

I dont understand finance and law as I am just a simply bloke but from the out side looking in it looks like the big 14 trying to stop new comers which I thought was against European trading law or something like that.